Help me move all of my blogs

September 28, 2006

Enough Talk: Time for Action

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 9:52 pm

Enough Talk: Time for Action

On September 9, 2006, there was a rally held in Washington, DC. It was held in front of the White House, and 30 people ended up going to jail. Not because they were unruly, they were not. It was because they laid down on the pavement as if laying down their lives for their Darfurian brother and sisters.

Then there was another rally on September 17th in New York City. It was held in front of the United Nations complex. Thousands of people came from all over the world. Those who were unable to come held vigils in their own communities. It was a day of prayer, hope and outreach.

For over three years now, we have been writing, rallying, talking and “discussing” the genocide occurring in Darfur, Sudan. These dictators cannot even decide on a definition for what is genocide. How are they going to come up with a solution?

It was stated by Kofi Annan that he regrets the genocide that occurred in Rwanda. Many wonder how many people are aware of the fact that Kofi Annan was in charge of Rwanda at the time of this genocide?

Now the UN wants more talks, because President Bashir is not willing to allow the UN peacekeeping forces onto his soil. When will it have been enough for you? What will it take to wake up those who would rather turn a blind eye to this tragic crisis?

We have had the great honor to have another interview with Mr. Jay McGinley. There is a planned “hunger strike” on October 5, 2006. That is correct. It will only be for one day. Why don’t we find out what Mr. McGinley thinks about this?

Greetings, Mr. Jay McGinley. It is so nice to speak with you again. So many questions, so little time. Especially for the people of Darfur, Sudan. Are you ready to answer a few questions?

Good afternoon. Yes, I am quite ready. I have been looking forward to all interviews that have to do with saving the Darfurians. It just seems there are so few people interested. That is one reason why I am pushing forward.

Great. Let’s begin.

1.How many people attended the September 9th rally?
I would estimate 300-500 people, some of whom traveled a mighty distance, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, and North Carolina….

Regarding Darfur, I am extremely difficult to please. I am a “father” and “brother” of 4,000,000 people in my “immediate family” that are being slaughtered by Bashir. Where is the outcry by my international brothers and sisters?

My point? My being difficult to please is never “personal,” rather my best attempt at a professional, objective, “Family Emergency Respone” assessment of whether our response is “commensurate”, “realistic in terms of the challenges”, “adequate” …

The September 9th Africa Action event you inquired about is, to my eyes, “the model” so far of an honest, appropriate and hopeful event.

(The April 30th event was also excellent. Save Darfur was the quarterback on that one.)

It was an extremely disciplined group of people and speakers. They were serious and committed from the time they arrived until the time they departed about 3 hours later. Everyone was on purpose, working the entire time. It was an honor and deep joy to be a part of and an honor to our Darfur family.

2. Was there any coverage by the media? If so, could we find these sources?

The next day the Washington Post had a fine article with a good photo: Washington Post article; Africa Action has a good writeup: September 9th Rally Updates; and there is a good assembly of photos at: 30 ARRESTED AT WHITE HOUSE SATURDAY and SEPT 17: FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION.

3. How many people were able to attend the NYC rally on the September 17, 2006?
In my eyes, it was larger than what I’ve seen reported. 20,000-30,000 is what I’ve seen reported.

This crowd actually, in both quantity and quality, is a source of alarm to me as an indicator of how insufficiently we are generating “will” among “we the people”; the mandate we owe President Bush.

On April 30th in DC at the US Capitol, the organizers turned out 30,000-70,000 (yes these are the estimates I’ve seen. 30,000-40,000 is my guess.) The quality of crowd participation was fabulous – serious, reverent, united, disciplined, working hard the entire 3 hours and with virtually no exceptions.

Why am I alarmed by the September 17th rally? Since April 30th things have gotten much worse in Darfur; the impotence of our international efforts thus far have become more glaring; NYC has a vastly larger local population from which to draw a crowd than does DC, so the numbers should have been some multiple of April 30th; and the quality of the participation was greatly less than on April 30th!

We should have had 100,000 or more. (Only praise is due the organizers and those that worked with them.) Thank goodness the 30,000 folks turned out, but almost all of the qualities which so blessed the April 30th crowd were less present in all but a handful of the September 17th attendees. For many, the 17th appeared to be not much more than a nice day, seeing folks and being seen in the park.

Yes. That is the right of those folks, and it is my right to be honest about how much further we have to go to stop this genocide. We must do better. We can do better. I am certain that deep down, we want to do better.

4. How many cities, states and countries were involved?
The reports I’ve seen are that two dozen to four dozen cities around the world were involved. Again, enormous credit to the organizers. But our measure, we that are committed to Darfur, of course is – are we doing enough? Is it enough? And the answer is, September 17th was not nearly the mandate that we owed to President Bush, not nearly enough to rescue Darfur. We the people are failing them.

Here are the sources I have used:

5. You are *participationg* in the October 5th “FAST,” but you have already been on a true hunger strike since July 4, 2006, and in 4 waves now. That is a total of 58 days, and counting. What do these people hope to accomplish in only one day?
Hmm. Actually, I am praying with my entire being to cause an expansion, a dramatic expansion of the options for those participating in STAND’s (Students Taking Action Now Darfur) October 5th event. Why? Well, as usual, STAND’s instincts and planning are great; but I feel certain, yes certain, that history will judge–a one day only “fast from snacks”–as heinously inadequate, morally bankrupt, in the face of Genocide.

Actually, it is worse than that. Students have always been our leaders in social struggles throughout history. Our actions speak much louder than words. A one day fast from snacks shouts that Darfur is not an emergency. This is not what the organizers intend. We must do better

I know STAND to be a group that is of fine inclinations and I hope to encourage them, and their participants to a response that is more appropriate in the face of genocide, and more worthy of the courage and humanity that I know the organizers, participants and my fellow world citizens posses.

Is it too radical to suggest that on October 5th we start: RESCUE DARFUR FAST; an open ended fast that 1000’s of us undertake? Will history forgive us for doing less? I know of no options on the table other than this for citizens to really step up to the plate in a way that history, their children and their grand-children themselves will find acceptable, appropriate, humane and courageous when we look back 10 years from now.

We and Darfur are out of time. With Bashir’s escalation of his extermination campaign, the death rates are likely headed to 25,000 per week (that is six (6) 911’s per week. per week!) We need a plan and we need it now.

I’ve done 58 days of Hunger Strike (water only Fast) this summer in 4 waves. I am currently on the 4th wave. Is it easy you might ask? If it is done out of love for our Darfur family? YES! It is shockingly easy. Truly easy. (Don’t tell anyone.) And it is profoundly joyful. $10,000,000,000 could not get me to stop what I am trying to do, including the water only Fast.

But Jay, people have lives; masses of them cannot just go on an open ended total Fast! I have been a full time activist since May 14, 2006. [It is amazing the freedom you have if you sell (out of necessity) all of your possessions, live on the street....]

Yes, not all of us can or should go quite that far. My point is, I’ve been extremely, amazingly functional through day 23 on just water. This is something that billions of people can do! For those with more physically active roles that they fulfill: students, moms, laborers, ect., they can do 1,000 calories a day and be just as completely committed. They can remain normally functional for many weeks, just as those of us on just water! Aside from temporary edema and water retention in my legs, there’s not a hint of damage to my health after cumulative 58 days; even with me living on the streets. Honestly, health fanatics frequently fast for 40 days or more to get cleansed and to get more healthy!

I am in the process of building a web site with information on all of this. I think it will be called “Darfur: Dying for Heroes”; inspired by the extraordinary study by Eva Fogleman on the non-Jewish “Rescuers” of WWII, “Conscience and Courage, Rescuers of Jews During the Holocaust.”

In the last 20 years, reports are as high as 6 million people have already been exterminated in Sudan – 3 million Christains in the south and more people in the Nuba mountains.

The Jewish organization, Vlad Yashim, has identified more than 10,000 oursiders. These include non-Jewish Rescuers, Heroes, that stepped up, put skin in the game, and saved people, saved strangers. They did so at unimaginable personal sacrifice. Unimaginable. Usually they put their “immediate family” at risk of death or worse, by doing so.

I can capture the truth of Darfur no better than in the words – Darfur: Dying for Heroes. So far 6 million people have been exterminated in Sudan; 400,000 in Darfur in just the last 3 years. Where are the heroes? This is also something we must solve.

6. What are your recommendations to help the people of Darfur, Sudan?
Until this week, I had only one recommendation to the frustration of everyone that has asked me. Now I have two. Thank God.

1. Reject the double standard we live under. For yourself, and your children and grandchildren, take this God-given opportunity to do so much good, SO MUCH GOOD, by stopping the slaughter of 4 million people at so little personal cost. Use this once-in-history opportunity to rise above the double standard: Treating “immediate family” one way and others another way. Simply, “do unto others ALL that you would have them do unto you.” I have never been more serious in my life.

But now, for the first time in my 26 months being possessed by the Darfur Genocide, I have a 2nd recommendation: A concrete recommendation:

2. October 5th, 2006, start: RESCUE DARFUR FAST. Never have so many had the opportunity to do so little to help so many in such an extraordinary degree. Please God, don’t let us let this opportunity pass. YES, it will take a miracle for us to respond. Let us surrender to the Divine within us, and let us make a miracle.

Billions of us will never get such an extraordinary opportunity to finally be “saved” from ignoring the “least of these our brothers.” Such a violation of human rights as this should appall everyone.

The central mandate of every ethical tradition – “do unto others ALL….” NONE OF US NEED BE HURT. None of us will truly suffer. But we can stop genocide for the first time in the history of mankind, if we are dedicated to doing so.

Would you go on a long term fast to save your five (5) dearest loved ones? In a heartbeat you would and in doing so, you increase the ranks of Heroes by one more. As a friend of mine has reminded me, by more than one, because others will follow a leader.

7. Do you remember the sign that declares, “War is better than a bad peace” being held by the Darfurians? Do you think this will come to that if Bashir continues to thumb his nose at the United Nations? Explain.
I have yet to see any evidence that what is needed is forced-entry to Sudan. No evidence whatsoever. Ultimately, should we be willing to do so? “As you do unto the least of these my family, you do unto me.” Of course. If it were our “family,” wouldn’t we go in? Well it is our family! Every religion, and every conscience tells us so.

However, all evidence that I see says that the bully Bashir can be bullied. No question of it. We’ve done it – South Sudan! The SLA leader who brokered this deal stands for nothing but his own selfish interest. We can overtly and covertly threaten that interest and thereby radically change his behavior. Again.

We need to remove China as an obstacle by pledging to the world that we will leave China’s preferential access to Sudan oil out to dry and by embarrassing China as a defender of Genocide (this has started).

We need to twist the arms of India and Malaysia to stop trading with Bashir and buffering him from our sanctions; we need to follow through aggressively on the honest threats that Sec. of State Rice leveled at Bashir today (Rice Warns of Punitive Steps If Sudan Refuses UN Darfur Force), that he is at a personal and professional “fork in the road” with respect to obstructing the UN; we need to totally play the International Criminal Court (ICC) card so that they can see prison or execution in the their future, unless they back down now; we need to back the Arabs away from supporting Bashir; we need to cause a re-negotiation of the May 5, 2006.

The Darfur Peace Agreement did not favor of the 80% of the Darfuries (2 factions), and they did not sign it. They were correct not to sign it. The DPA is tragically inequitable to Darfur as it stands. This is all, all doable, if we give the mandate to the US administration. If we pay the price by the 1000’s in the form of a mass RESCUE DARFUR FAST.

Anything less, and 4 million die. So do we. Would it work? Would we use a mass FAST to save these camps if they contained our dearest loved ones? Could we put a man on the moon? Can we put a city block’s worth of computer power on a microchip? The will. We must raise the will. Or God help us and them.

Thank you so much for your time. Again, it is an honor to help you get your message out to those of us who care about others. Have a wonderful day.

The honor is mine. God bless you and your work.

{{{END OF INTERVIEW}}}

What a sobering situation. While you may not agree with his worldview, we can at least agree that something urgently needs to be done to save the lives of thousands.

Let us take a step back for a moment. What would have been your worldview in the 1930’s? 1940’s? Would your apathy have been turned to anguish at the end of WWII? You have the opportunity to avoid this from happening again.

Republicans, Democrats, Liberals, and Conservatives all agree, for the most part, that Darfur needs our help. They are being murdered, raped, starved and enslaved everyday. We can and should do something about this. Something you should ponder.

Jay has asked to speak about one more item, and I believe he should have that right.

We cannot choose our timing on when to stop this genocide. (For me, this is what is meant by “God’s time.” He sets the time He demands of us, and they usually are completely unreasonable!) Situations have their own internal time demands – “launch windows,” “acceleration requirements.” My entire life has been spent saving people’s “lives” in the computer industry by helping to turn around their failing, “crashing” organizations. What I am discussing now is one of the few things I know exceedingly well.

The launch window, if we are going to rescue Darfur, is now and the next few weeks. Now. Why now? Many reasons:

  • Bashir is a brilliant study, as are all genocidists in history. He is learning today his final lesson: If we, the citizens of the world, are all “talk” or if there is to be a “bite,” he will reach his conclusion. Now, based on what he sees in the next several weeks. (He killed more aid workers in the last month than in the last 3 years.)
  • Death rates are pushing toward 25,000 per month, as fast as Bashir can drive the aid workers away.
  • Public opinion has been raised at enormous cost over the last 3 months! Thank God!

President Bush is talking. Rice is threatening! Press is writing! France is acting! China is embarrassed! Britain is posturing! Raising so much energy is like firing stages on a rocket launch. We must light-up the next stage now or the weight of the issue will bring Darfur down with a fury, a final and irrecoverable crash.

We saw the precursor to this with the fabulous April 30th Rally. Huge “first stage,” but no “2nd stage”! The rocket crashed. This was a profound tragedy. We lost probably another 30,000 brothers and sisters to the exterminator, Bashir.

It is now or never.

Category: Human Rights, Darfur, Sudan and The UN.

ACLU Defines Hypocrisy

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 6:58 am

Crossposted from Stop The ACLU:

In case you haven’t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is fed up with is hypocrisy and the ACLU is full of it. Purging the ACLU of its hypocrisy is bound to be a goliath task.

Where do we even begin with the ACLU’s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term “the people” that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to “the people” as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn’t be that the Second Amendment doesn’t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it?

In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search.

The ACLU have fought tooth and nail against the Bush administration’s NSA program, a program designed to track international phone calls being made to or from suspected terrorist organizations. They have hailed themselves defenders of the right to privacy and labelled the program an illegal “secret” program of “domestic spying”. All the while the ACLU has its own “secret” program of domestic spying of its own members and their personal financial information. This program has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with the real bottom line of fundraising. Former ACLU board member Michael Myers was shocked at this discovery.

The American Civil Liberties Union is using sophisticated technology to collect a wide variety of information about its members and donors in a fund-raising effort that has ignited a bitter debate over its leaders’ commitment to privacy rights.

Some board members say the extensive data collection makes a mockery of the organization’s frequent criticism of banks, corporations and government agencies for their practice of accumulating data on people for marketing and other purposes.

The group’s new data collection practices were implemented without the board’s approval or knowledge and were in violation of the ACLU’s privacy policy at the time, according to Michael Meyers, vice president of the organization and a frequent internal critic. He said he had learned about the new research by accident Nov. 7 during a meeting of the committee that is organizing the group’s Biennial Conference in July.

He objected to the practices, and the next day, the privacy policy on the group’s Web site was changed. “They took out all the language that would show that they were violating their own policy,” Meyers said. “In doing so, they sanctified their procedure while still keeping it secret.”

After spending 23 years on the ACLU board, the “defenders of free speech” issued gag orders to him, not to speak about the issue. Now thats free speech for you.

When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with “God Hates Fags” signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so!

When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters’ free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU’s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights.

But don’t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Execuitve Director:

The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history.

But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU’s press release: “We view the jury’s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.”

Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change.

The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled “The Nuremberg Files,” after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called “baby butchers.” …

This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past.

Defending NAMBLA to print material advocating for sex between grown men and boys is the definition of defending “robust freedom of speech” in the ACLU’s book, but defending people’s right to protest against killing the unborn somehow fails to make the list.

But the hypocrisy does not end there. When it comes to protecting religious expression the ACLU has proven itself to be number one in America’s religious censors. They have consistently shown themselves to be hostile towards Christianity in particular. When the Tangipahoa Parish School Board in Louisiana opened its board meetings with a prayer like they had for 30 years the ACLU sued. After the ACLU won that case and the School Board ignored the court ruling, Louisiana ACLU chief Joe Cook called for them to be jailed and compared them to terrorists. Mr. Cook is currently leading an attack on plan for a Katrina memorial paid for with private funds to be errected on private land simply because it is in the shape of a cross and might offend some sensitive passerby. When valedictorian of Foothill High, Brittany McComb, decided to share her faith voluntarily at her graduation cermony the ACLU said it was the right call to pull the plug. Currently when the ACLU wins a case from attacking religious expression it is awarded attorneys fees, often in the millions, at the expense of the American taxpayer. The U.S. House of Representatives recognized this abuse and passed the Public Expression Of Religion Act to put a stop to it. However, the threats and abuse will continue however if we can’t convince the Senate to pass this as well.

But the hypocrisy goes even further. The ACLU’s disdain for free speech outside of its agenda extends beyond Christians and pro-lifers to its own dissenting members. Very recently the ACLU attempted to put forth a policy restricting the free speech of its own members.

Natt Hentoff, another former ACLU board member, was incredulous.

“For the national board to consider promulgating a gag order on its members — I can’t think of anything more contrary to the reason the A.C.L.U. exists.”

After a huge controversy, media coverage, and public concern of the NY Attorney General’s office the ACLU dropped the proposal. Instead they switched to more effective measures of replacing or voting out the members that were not in line with their agenda.

When it comes to principles the ACLU has none other than lining their pocketbooks and furthering their own liberal agenda. As I said at the beggining of the article, cleansing the ACLU of hypocrisy will be a mammoth task. I don’t think its possible. I’m more hopeful that their own greed and corruption will eat them from the inside. I think we are beggining to see the cracks and hopefully enough light will shine through them to wake people up to the truth.

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com or Gribbit at GribbitR@gmail.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.

You will also be able to find this article at Links and Categories under the heading of Stop the ACLU.

Spiegel Interviews US Ambassador to Afghanistan

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 12:05 am

Ambassador Newmann answers Spiegal with, “I’m glad nobody asked us in 1942 what our exit strategy was.” Right in the kisser. To read read this article, go here. If that link does work anymore, try this one. Thanks, and have a great day.

Category: Afghanistan.

September 27, 2006

Spiegel Interviews US Ambassador to Afghanistan

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 11:44 pm

We Are Not Going to Evacuate.
We Are Not Going Anywhere.

After a bloody summer in Afghanistan, the country now seems to be facing a bloody autumn. SPIEGEL spoke with US Ambassador Ronald Neumann, 61, about the growing Taliban presence, the need for more international support, and how dangerous it would be to give up.

SPIEGEL: Mr. Ambassador, since January you have managed to escape two separate attacks uninjured. Did those personal experiences change your perception of the security situation?

Neumann: No, this is the fourth war in my diplomatic career. I have had my embassy attacked by a mob, I have lived through assassination threats. But the evaluation of a situation depends on facts, not on emotional responses. It’s a difficult situation but it’s in much better shape than Iraq.

SPIEGEL: So, there is no heliport in case of an emergency?

Neumann: There are 20,000 American troops in this country. We are not going to evacuate, we are not going anywhere.

SPIEGEL: Before the summer started, you warned that it would be a bloody one. Now it looks like it could become a bloody autumn too. When do you think it will be possible to drive from Kabul to Kandahar again, Afghanistan’s most important city in the south?

Neumann: I don’t know. It’s just one rather large battle next to that highway, where there is a fairly large Taliban presence. The operation requires getting security down to fairly little villages and districts. That’s a complicated task. I think no insurgency in the 20th century has been less than a 10 year battle and I do not expect this one to be any better. I’m glad nobody asked us in 1942 what our exit strategy was.

SPIEGEL: Still, Europe was quite surprised that the Taliban was able to reorganize and to show such a strong presence in this country.

Neumann: Sometimes I think that dissatisfaction masquerades as surprise, because the facts were indeed not so terribly surprising. The Bonn process was about building national institutions. At the same time there was very limited governance in the provinces. Donations were slow to arrive. In some places you had contested tribal leaders, there were factions. Then you had the reorganization of the Taliban on the other side of the border. Then you had this development in NATO that troops went to places where it was quiet, not because those places were under government control but because they were under somebody else’s control. Then we began the poppy eradication program and that threatened those interests. I think a combination of these factors produced this large offensive of the insurgents.

SPIEGEL: The Taliban were able to reorganize in Pakistan. Who is helping them? Who is training them?

Neumann: What I know is that President Pervez Musharraf has in the last couple of weeks taken a much greater responsibility and he has acknowledged the presence of the Taliban in his country. He acknowledged the need to work against them. These are all very good first steps which all need to be followed by actions.

SPIEGEL: How many insurgents are there? Is there an endless amount of angry young men who go to Jihad and are ready to die?

Neumann: My perception is still that the Taliban are a fairly weak force, despite the increase in violence in Kabul. But there is no comparison to Baghdad at all. There are a lot of places in this country where people are going about their business with only occasionally a bit of violence. That is much more a testimony to Taliban weakness than to government strength. There is also not a lot of ideological support for the Taliban, even if local people are fighting for them.

SPIEGEL: How do you explain that?

Neumann: We learn from interrogation of prisoners that it is more a matter of local grievances, tribal differences, things that can be dealt with — not necessarily the deep ideological commitment of a suicide bomber.

SPIEGEL: What conclusions do you draw from such information?

Neumann: That we should continue with a double track approach. We should go on with major actions but also move parallel with the task of bringing more security to bear in local areas. And bringing development projects along with it. I think in this way the insurgency can be pushed back but I think it could go on for quite a while.

SPIEGEL: You were talking about 10 years?

Neumann: Easily.

SPIEGEL: At the same level as this summer?

Neumann: Not necessarily. We have a rather critical gap right now. The development of the army, of the police takes time. It will take at least two years for the army, possibly more for the police. And that is the period in which we need to concentrate on our own forces in the theater of war and, of course, on getting money for the Afghan forces and police. This can be done reasonably successfully.

SPIEGEL:What would be the next step?

Neumann: We have to put more guns in the field. Afghans have to believe they can survive in their home at night. You can’t win their hearts and minds if they think somebody else will put bullets through them. At the same time we have to keep that from being a means to rebuilding warlords and tribal militias because that works against the government.

SPIEGEL: Who is going to implement this, since — as you say — the government is fairly weak?

Neumann: We have to do it and it would be nice if others would help. But it would also be nice if other people would be willing to pay more into the law and order trust fund. We expect Afghan police to take these risks for $70 a month and we don’t even have enough money to pay them through the end of the year. I think several countries could put more money into that if they don’t want to put their troops in harm’s way.

SPIEGEL: Do you think the international community is prepared to put their money up for such a long time?

Neumann: I think they will. There is a clear learning curve. You can see that in the number of forces stationed here, the flexibility of their missions …

SPIEGEL: That’s not totally true. The Germans lack of flexibility meant a refusal to deploy in the more dangerous southern part of the country. The German forces were heavily criticized for that decision…

Part II: “Just because something is difficult, it is not a reason to immediately become a coward”.

Category: Afghanistan.

Declassified NIE: The Rest of the Story

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 6:57 am

The Rest of the Story: The NIE Reflects Previous Statements About the War on Terror and Setting the Record Straight.

I hope you take the time to browse these two documents. You may or may not be surprised. That would depend on whether or not you have been keeping on top of the threats that are facing this world, not just us.

There is also the actual document that has been declassified. Another black eye, eh Gray Lady? How many more? Do you really want us to lose? This badly? Have a nice day.

Category: Terrorism, Media and Treason.

Iraq takes charge of Dhi Qar province

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 4:14 am

Iraq takes charge of Dhi Qar province.
By Zalmay Khalilzad, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq , and Gen. George W. Casey Jr., Commanding General, Multi-National Force – Iraq

BAGHDAD — “Today’s transfer of security responsibility in Dhi Qar province from the Multi-National Force – Iraq to the Government of Iraq and civilian controlled Iraqi Security Forces is another sign of progress toward a stable and secure Iraq. Dhi Qar is the second of 18 Provinces to be transitioned. This is an important milestone along the successful path toward Iraq’s capability to govern and protect itself as a sovereign nation.”

“The joint decision between the Iraqi Government and the MNF-I to transition security responsibility reflects a satisfactory assessment of the overall threat situation in Dhi Qar, and increased capabilities of the ISF. Additionally, Dhi Qar’s provincial leadership has demonstrated the ability to take the lead in managing its own security and governance duties at the provincial level. Transition terms are in place to facilitate the transfer process, and Coalition forces stand ready to provide assistance if needed.”

“As Iraq develops and its needs continue to evolve, so too will the nature of international assistance and investment. The United States remains committed to the development of Dhi Qar province by providing funding for additional humanitarian relief and reconstruction projects.”

Currently, $8.9M in Economic Support Fund money and $5M in Commander’s Emergency Relief Program funds are programmed for the completion of additional projects in Dhi Qar. Several other provinces are close to meeting the criteria necessary to assume security independence.

“After decades of dictatorship and oppression, the Iraqi people have taken another step toward security self-reliance. With the steadfast support of the Coalition, Iraq is on a path to national unity, improved security, and increasing prosperity that benefits all its citizens.”

“May God bless the people of Iraq.”

Category: (Military) Press Release and Iraq.

Support the Troops Weekend – After Action Report

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 2:44 am

WRITTEN BY TOM, THE REDHUNTER!

My apologies that it has taken me several days to get this post up, but life has been keeping me very busy.

The bottom line is that we had two successful Support the Troops weekend events. Following are photos and a complete report.

There were two main events: Friday evening September 22 outside of Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington DC, and Saturday afternoon, September 23, at the Sylvan Theater near the Washington Monument, also in Washington DC.

Support the Troops 2006 was sponsored by FreeRepublic.com, the DC Chapter of FreeRepublic.com, Military Families Voice of Victory, and the Protest Warriors. I’m not sure if I’m officially a member of FreeRepublic but I’ve got a Freeper screen name and have participated in most of their events over the past year so I suppose that’s good enough.


Day 1 – Walter Reed Army Medical Center

This Friday marked our 75th straight Friday outside of Walter Reed. Our objectives are twofold; one, as a show of support for the troops, especially those on the bus which returns from a DC restaurant every Friday evening (more below). Second, to keep the radical leftist group Code Pink away from the entrance. Complete reports on all Walter Reed “freeps” can be found here. My own personal accounts of these and other rallies can be found here and here. I have been participating since August 2005.

We usually have 20-40 people show up for our Friday night freeps, but on this night I estimate we had well over 50. Our number were swelled partially due to the large number of George Washington University Republicans who joined us. They were quite an enthusiastic bunch and brought a lot of energy to our rally.

Here is our MOAB (“Mother Of All Banners”) which was directly across from the main entrance to the hospital.

Here are two more of the MOAB with lots of supporters incuding many of the GW Republicans


Here are some pro-troops supporters at the main entrance to the hospital. I took this photo from the corner where the MOAB was displayed.

Down the street about half a block are the radical supporters of Code Pink. As I was taking this photo Pinko leader Gael Murphy drove up and parked right in front of me. She asked what I was doing and I told her what whe perfectly well knew, that I was taking photos of her people. She held out some radical literature which I took. I’m always interested in that stuff so I figured why not? It turned out to be pretty standard stuff and not very interesting.


If you’re not familiar with Code Pink, I’ve got a lot posted about them over at The Redhunter, just go to the Categories section at right and see either “The Left” or “Rallies and Protests”. However, two pieces that explain matters pretty well can be found here (scroll down to where it says “The Case Against Code Pink) and here.

Code Pink used to occupy the corners right outside the entrance to the hospital, but we got the permit when they forgot to renew it last January.

At some point during the evening some lady came by to argue with us. I think that she was from the Pinkos, but am not entirely sure. I’ll find our more when the official after-action report comes out on FreeRepublic.com and will link to that. As you might imagine she was quickly surrounded and an “enthusiastic” discussion ensued.


Interestingly, the Pinkos show little interest in debating or arguing with us when we go down there. Several times over the past year wounded soldiers from the hospital have gone down to where the Pinkos are standing to tell them what they think of them (hint; it isn’t good). For a group that holds “We Support the Troops But Oppose the War” signs, most of them ignore the troopers.

Two weeks ago Milblogger SMASH went down to the Pinkos and told them off royally. He’s got audio and pictures on his website. Don’t miss it.

The Troop Bus

Every Friday evening several local charities (organized or partially sponsored by the Italian Embassy) take a busload of wounded troops and their visiting families out to a local restaurant. They return to the main entrance sometime between 9 and 11pm. When they do, the bus slows and the driver turns on the inside lights. We go crazy waving our signs and banners and they wave at us.

In case you think this doesn’t mean anything, two weeks ago an Army Captain and a Command Sergeant Major, all of the 101st Airborne Division drove up, parked, got out, and the following conversation ensued

The two men were clearly delighted at seeing this unambiguous show of support not just for the troops, but for their mission. “Wow! We’re just back for ten days and we came to visit some of our men in the hospital,” one of them related. “Seeing this is just fantastic — thank you!” he exclaimed, to which we returned a volley of “No, thank you! We thank you!

“When we’re in Iraq, it’s so great to know you’re here,” he continued.

“How do you know we’re here?” I asked.

“The Internet — we knew there were people like you out here while we were in Iraq,” he smiled, “and we appreciate it! How about some photos?” They lined up the group of young people and snapped several shots before jumping back into the vehicle with broad grins and waves, and more shouts of “Thank you for your service!” from FReepers.

In addition, I’ve talked to dozens of troops at the hospital in the past year I’ve been doing this and can tell you that they are all very happy that we are outside.

In addition, after all this most of us go inside the hospital complex to Malogne House. All of us bring things for their donation tables, things from food treats to coloring books for the kids (their families come and visit) to cigarettes and books and videos. We visit for about an hour or so but of course by then it’s getting late

Day 2 – The Support the Troops Rally in Washington DC

The main event for Support the Troops Weekend took place from noon until 3 at Sylvan Theater, an outdoor mini-arena which is in one of the corners of the large field where the Washington Monument stands.

First off was an opening ceremony. We said the Pledge of Allegiance, sang the Star Spangled Banner, and a military chaplain said an invocation. Kristinn Taylor, co-founder and current president of the DC chapter of FreeRepublic.com, moderated the event. Kristinn organizes the Friday night Walter Reed Freeps as well as many other rallies and counter-protests. The flag was made by children at Ft Benning after 9/11


Over the next few hours we heard from several speakers.

* Larry Schweikart – co-author of Patriots History of the United States
* Mychal Massie – Project 21
* Richard August – father of Cpt Matthew J. August, KIA 1/27/04, Iraq
* Capt. Larry Bailey, USN Ret. – Vets for the Truth
* Ray and Becky Davis – Military Families Voice of Victory
* Diana Irey – Washington County Commissioner, Pennsylvania, and running for Congress against Jack Murtha
* Nikki Mendicino – POW/MIA activist
* Kevin Martin - Project 21; veteran, USN
* Eve Tidwell – God Bless Ft. Benning
* Frank Schaeffer – co-author of AWOL, author Faith of Our Sons-a Father’s Wartime Diary
* Wes Vernon – Accuracy in Media
* Evan Sayet – Writer/Entertainer
* Leo Flood, father of son who served in Iraq and Afghanistan
* Richard Linn, father of LCpl. Karl R. Linn, KIA 1/26/05, Iraq
* Kristinn Taylor, D.C. Chapter of FreeRepublic.com

Here is Larry Bailey speaking

Another crowd scene with some of the flags we had.

No rally would be complete without a few anti-war heckers. We ignored them and they went away. I quoted Ann Coulter to ConcreteBob; “If you’re not pissing them off you’re not doing your job!” Given that ConcreteBob is the president of the DC chapter of the Protest Warriors, and the person who got the permit away from Code Pink for the entrance to Walter Reed, he was one who I knew would appreciate the quote.

Channel 4 News came by and did a few interviews. I searched their site but haven’t been able to find anything about the rally on it. The Washington Times had a reporter there and they did an honest story on the event. Their estimation of 70-100 people was what I counted also. Conservatives just don’t draw large crowds for these things. It’s just not in our culture.

Diana Irey, the lady running against Jack Murtha, gave a good talk. From what I read the Democrats are putting lots of money into the race to make sure they don’t suffer the embarrassment of a Murtha loss, so while I doubt that she’ll win at least we’re putting up a good candidate.

Closing Ceremonies

Finally – all true pro-troop patriots reading this who can swing by Washington DC for a weekend are welcome to join us Friday nights at Walter Reed! Don’t be shy, we get new people every week. We even serve pizza, so what’s not to like? But if you don’t find yourself in this area, consider holding your own rallies or counter-protests. There are FreeRepublic and Protest Warrior chapters in most major cities, so you can also contact them. There’s probably more going on than you realize. Show your support!

What Extremists Are Saying

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 1:49 am

What Extremists are Saying.

On 11 September 2006, a jihadist website attributed to the Islamic Renewal Organization posted several links to Al-Sahab Media Production’s 76-minute interview with Ayman al-Zawahiri, second-in-command in Al-Qa’ida.

At the beginning of the videotape, the following note appears: “In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate.”

“Warning: We do not allow the airing of this videotape with music; we urge everybody to abide.”

“Greetings of Al-Sahab Media Productions.”

Then, excerpts taken from the interview itself are highlighted.

Then, a screen caption reads in Arabic and English: “Hot Issues interview with Shaykh Ayman Al-Zawahiri 1427 hegira [corresponding to] September 2006.”

Then, Al-Zawahiri, wearing a white robe and turban, appears on the screen while the voice of an unidentified interviewer who does not appear throughout the interview is heard.

The following is the full translation of Al-Zawahiri statement:

[Unidentified interviewer] In the name of God and thanks be to God and prayers and peace be upon Prophet Muhammad, his kinfolk, companions, and followers.
Dear Shaykh Ayman Al-Zawahiri: Peace be upon you.

[Al-Zawahiri] Peace be upon you.

[Interviewer] Al-Sahab Media Productions is pleased to hold its second interview with you almost a year after its first interview. It has been five years since the blessed raids of New York and Washington and many events have happened since our first interview. So, we welcome you, our dear shaykh, as Al-Sahab’s guest. We pray God that this interview would clear facts and include a benefit to the mujahidin, Muslims, and every free person seeking justice.

[Al-Zawahiri] Amen. We pray God that this would happen.

[Interviewer] Dear Shaykh Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The fact is that we have many important and serious issues which we hope to discuss. We have Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Algeria, the United States, and the situation in Arab and Islamic countries and others. So, how about if we start talking about Lebanon and Palestine?

[Al-Zawahiri] Very well; go ahead.

[Interviewer] How do you comment on this clear-cut injustice in Lebanon and Gaza and what is the duty of Muslims in this connection?

[Al-Zawahiri] In the name of God and thanks be to God and prayers and peace be upon Prophet Muhammad, his kinfolk, companions, and followers. This injustice and oppression is a clear feature of the features of the Crusader-Zionist aggression against the Muslim nation. When three Israeli soldiers were captured, all of the Crusaders rushed to support Israel. Whereas the fact that there are 10,000 Palestinians sitting in prisons of the Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine, including almost 700 women and children, does not make neither the Crusaders nor the United Nations, the international false witness, act.

The Muslim nation should come forward with all that is at its disposal to aid its Muslim brothers in Lebanon and Gaza — all according to their capabilities. The strongest image depicting support for our Muslim brothers in both countries is represented by attacking the interests of the Jews, Crusaders, and those collaborating with them. The Israeli shells and rockets which roast the flesh of our children come from the nations of the Crusader west which have been supporting Israel since its establishment. The materialistic Crusader western civilization knows not the language of ethics and principles but understands the language of punishment and retribution. So, if they taste some of what they are inflicting on our women and children, then they will start giving up their arrogance, stubbornness, and greed and will seek to solve the problem between them and the Muslims.

The concentration should be on their economic interests, patricianly on halting theft of Muslims’ stolen oil. Every Muslim should consider that anything that harms Mu sli ms in Lebanon and Gaza also harms his son, daughter, brother, sister, father, and mother.

The Muslim nation should know that the governments of Arab and Islamic countries are helpless and even colluding with the enemies if the nation. Israel managed to overrun Lebanon and Gaza only because Egypt completely abandoned the battlefield with Israel. In fact, it acknowledged that it would not help any Arab country, which Israel attacks. This is enshrined in Article 6 of the peace treaty with Israel which asserts the priority and precedence of the peace treaty over any other agreement. Thus, Egypt has officially washed its hands of the long-defunct joint Arab defense pact which obligates the Arab states to cooperate in order to confront any aggression on any one of them. Arab states, one after the other, have followed Egypt to this failure and evasiveness. This collusion was clearly reflected in the stands of the rulers of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan on the Israeli aggression against Gaza and Lebanon. All governments of the Arab and Muslim countries are members of the UN the charter of which obligates them to preserve the security, safety, and unity of Israel’s lands because it is a member just like them in the UN. This is a fact clearer than the sun. The governments of all Arab and Muslim countries have recognized the legitimacy of the United Nations which is trying to burry Palestine, erase it from existence, and replace it with Israel. The United Nations is trying to impose around Israel a cordon of capitulation agreements and international forces to prevent Muslims from liberating Palestine and to isolate the mujahidin in Palestine from the mujahidin outside Palestine. This is why the Muslim nation should reject all these agreements and al these international forces and to establish their jihadist bases on the borders of Palestine against the will of the enemies of Muslims who seek to turn Israel into a permanent reality. This is why Muslims everywhere should do their utmost to break these barriers which have been and continue to be established around Palestine. We should not despair no matter how much it takes us to reach Palestine and joine up with its mujahidin to liberate the first of the two Qiblahs and the third of Al-Haramin [the two Holy Mosques in Mecca and Madina].

[Interviewer] But the Israeli bombing of Lebanon was very violent. What do you demand of Muslims in Lebanon and their supporters in the Islamic world?

[Al-Zawahiri] I call on them not TO surrender to the pressure applied by the Crusader west and to mount a popular jihadist war against the Crusader invasion and against everyone trying to prevent the mujahidin from liberating Palestine. It is not acceptable to surrender whenever the enemies of Islam bomb us and to accept what they want. The Crusader enemy bombed our sons and women in Chechnya, Afghanistan, and Iraq. In spite of this, the mujahidin did not surrender nor accepted the plans of the Crusader enemy. They continued the popular jihadist resistance which exhausted the enemy because of its ongoing bleeding. Muslims in Lebanon should free themselves from the restrains of political affiliations and the confines of the Sykes Picot agreement, and to wage a jihad for the sake of sake of God away from the interests of countries and their ambitions, in a battle that would become one with the jihad of the entire nation against the contemporary Crusader campaign; and wage a popular war of jihad that does not stop until the religion in its entirety is for Allah. The popular jihadsit war is the thing most feared by the Zionist-Crusader enemy. This war has rubbed his nose in dirt in Chechnya, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

[Interviewer] But some might argue that this could exceed the ability of Lebanese people?

[Al-Zawahiri] God, the exalted, says:” Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war.” [Koranic verse] If Muslims are unable to repel the enemy, then Muslims should prepare for that. But the im p ort a nt and seriou s matter is for Muslims in Lebanon to reject international resolutions, particularly the recent Security Council Resolution 1701. These resolutions which seek to surround the mujahidin and protect the Jews in Palestine. We must not accept these resolutions and not help entrench the presence of Israel and protect it with international resolutions.

My dear brother: The biggest disaster in Resolution 1701 and other similar resolutions intended to humiliate Muslim is that it recognizes the existence of the Hebrew state, and calls for isolating the mujahidin in Palestine and separating them from the Muslims in Lebanon. This separation is entrenched through international forces holding enmity to Islam. It also underscores the criminalization of jihad against the Jewish state and its right to strike the mujahidin. Regretfully, everyone who approves of this resolution would be recognizing all these disasters.

[Interviewer] Can we conclude from your talk that you consider Palestine the central cause of the Muslim nation and that the Lebanese problem is a branch of it, or supplementary to it, or secondary in importance?

[Al-Zawahiri] There is no doubt about that. Before anything else, the problem of Lebanon and all of our other problems are subject to Islamic law and we cannot solve them in any way that contradicts the Islamic law. This is the basis. As for implementation, it is not acceptable to deal with the Lebanese problem in a manner that would do injustice to the Palestinian cause. Moreover, we are a one nation waging a one war on multiple fronts. All the causes of Muslims in Chechnya, Kashmir, Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, and Algeria are our causes and battles.

[Interviewer] but some say that what you call for is madness and ignores the realities of international policies?

[Al-Zawahiri] This kind of thinking is what got us where we are now. Every time we violate the principles of Islam and give in to the law of infidel countries and bow to their decisions in order to exchange our religion and rights for a small gain. We would lose the religion and life together. The facts of international politics are facts of the humiliation and repression of Muslims at the hands of dictators controlling this world. This is why only those to whom religion, honor, and dignity are an easy matter. As for the mind they claim to have, Al-Mutnabi [famous Arab poet] spoke of by saying:

The cowards consider impotence to be smart And that is the deception of lowly nature [poetry]

My dear brother: The facts of international politics which they talk about stem from what they term as international legitimacy, the United Nations, and secular states which are the fruits of the malicious Sykes Picot Agreement. All these systems have been imposed on Muslims and the Muslim nation following the fall of the Caliphate state to force it to submit to systems and organizations that violate the Islamic law and to ensure the fragmentation of the Islamic nation. This will ultimately leave the Islamic nation subordinate, humiliated, and pillaged. The time has come for us to destroy these idols and false gods that they forced us to worship instead of Allah.

[Interviewer] But who will carry the burden of mobilizing the nation to the field of confrontation with its enemies?

[Al-Zawahiri] The mujahid vanguards of the Muslim nation, because the organizations that affiliate themselves with Islam that have abandoned jihad and recognized the legitimacy of the tyrants are too weak to confront the attacking enemy. The Muslim nation with its mujahid vanguard stands alone in the confrontation field, defending the nation’s creed, sanctities, homelands, and resources.

[Interviewer] But a number of renowned individuals and long-established organizations are leading the nation astray in the labyrinths of politics to divert it from confrontation.

[Al-Zawahiri] Anyone who tries to divert the nation from that i s either deceiving i t, working against it, or both. What happened in Qana and the daily non-stop massacres in Gaza mean that our enemies see us as a worthless nation, and that we will only establish the rule of our religion and regain our dignity by fighting the crusaders, Zionists, and their agents.

[Interviewer] Your response actually raises a number of questions: What targets should the mujahidin strike, should they strike only the military targets of the crusaders and the Jews, or should they also strike their civilian targets, and if so, why? Second, is the jihad against Israel limited to killing the Jews in Palestine only? Third, are the crusaders and Zionists weakening under the violent strikes, or are the mujahidin banging their heads against rocks.

[Al-Zawahiri] Regarding the targets that the mujahidin should strike, they should strike any target that would weaken the aggressive crusader-Zionist campaign on the land of Islam. Shari’ah does not recognize people as civilian or military, but classifies them into fighters and non-fighters, with fighters being all those who fight in person or assist the fighting with their money or opinion. Durayd Bin-al-Summah was killed on the day of the battle of Hunayn for advising the Hawazin [a tribe that was planning to attack Muslims] even though he was an old man.

The West’s crusader people are, in the eyes of Shari’ah, a fighting people who are at war with the Muslims because they chose their leaders and parliaments by their own free will, meaning they chose the executive authority that commits aggression against Islam and Muslims, and chose the legislative authority that monitors the executive authority, holds it accountable, and approves or rejects any of this authority’s policies as it pleases. These people also pay the taxes that fund the campaigns of aggression against the Muslims; it is they who provide the armies invading the lands of Islam with men, money, opinion, and expertise; and it is they who secure the manpower for the crusader security services that strive to conquer and subdue Muslims. Even those among these people who oppose the policies of the crusader governments view these governments as legitimate governments that have the right to order them to participate in the fighting against us, and believe it is their duty to obey these governments. Furthermore, all the political parties in the crusader West supported the establishment of Israel and its usurpation of Palestine, and to this day continue to support its existence and presence, even supporting it with money, arms, expertise, and manpower.

[Interviewer] What about [calls for] limiting anti-Jew operations meant to liberate Palestine to the Palestinian territories?

[Al-Zawahiri] If those who advocate this opinion believe it conforms to Shari’ah, they are mistaken, because Allah, the Truth and Exalted, says: “And fight the Pagans all together as they fight you all together.” [Koranic verse] If, on the other hand, they do so with the intention of serving the greater interest, then they are also mistaken, because they would be protecting the crusader-Zionist enemy outside Palestine, and would be providing the neglectful clerics of the sultans and their like with justifications for their failure to champion the Muslims in Palestine. We cannot watch our brothers in Lebanon and Palestine getting killed at the hands of the Jews with the support of the crusader West and stand silent and motionless. Championing our Muslim brethren in Lebanon and Palestine and the Muslims being attacked throughout the land of Islam is the Islamic duty of every Muslim. The Jews and crusaders every where must pay for the murder of our Muslim brothers in Lebanon, Palestine, and throughout the Land of Islam.

There is a crucial point that I would like to bring to the attention of Muslims: Fighting the invaders in Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, Kashmir, Chechnya, and everywhere else should be based on the Isl am ic creed and not a ny other principles. Our fighting must not be dictated by respect for the United Nations Charter, its resolutions, or the territorial integrity of its members, one of whom is Israel. Nor should it seek to implement the armistice treaty and cease-fire agreement or observe the Sykes-Picot boundaries or international legitimacy — our fighting should be a jihad for the sake of Allah so that only He may be worshipped, a jihad that strives to liberate Palestine, all of Palestine, and any land that was ever a land of Islam, from Al-Andalus [Spain] to Iraq.

[Interviewer] Regarding Lebanon in particular, do you have any advice for Muslims on how to deter Israel from attacking it?

[Al-Zawahiri] I call on every sincere Muslim who can reach southern Lebanon to do so in order to defeat the invading Zionist forces in Lebanon. We must inflict losses on these forces with the help of Allah, and we must strive with everything we have to establish a base for jihad along the borders of Palestine that remains in contact with the mujahidin on the inside in order to liberate Jerusalem and return every grain of sand in Palestine to the Muslims.

[Interviewer] What about those who doubt the feasibility of jihadist operations against the Jews and Crusaders?

[Al-Zawahiri] These people constitute a pathological phenomenon and have been so in the history of all nations. Their slackness and disparagement of the mujahidin have been noted in the Koran, in which Allah, the Truth and Exalted, says “Lo! The hypocrites say, and those in whose hearts is a disease: ‘These people,- their religion has misled them.’ But if any trust in Allah, behold! Allah is Exalted in might, Wise,” and says “Lo! The hypocrites say, and those in whose hearts is a disease: Allah and His Messenger promised us nothing but delusions.” These people pretend not to see the disaster that befell America following the New York and Washington raids, and pretend not to see the historic dilemma that America got itself into in Iraq and Afghanistan. They also feign ignorance of the major defeat suffered by Russia — the superpower — in Afghanistan.

[Interviewer] Let us turn to Iraq if you may.

[Al-Zawahiri] Sure, go ahead.

[Interviewer] Today in Iraq, a certain trend is leading the jihad against the US-led crusader alliance — a trend that plainly and clearly declares the creed of our pious forefathers and champions it with its hands, words, blood, and money. It is the trend of jihad and mujahidin. Allah has blessed their sacrifices, for, as you have said, America is embroiled in a historic mess in Iraq. There is also a trend that calls for a truce with the Americans and for an end to the jihadist resistance against them, claiming that the Americans will remain so long as there is a resistance, and will only leave once satisfied that the resistance has ended. Would you care to comment?

[Al-Zawahiri] Allow me to go into some detail here given the gravity of this issue.

[Interviewer] Please go ahead.

[Al-Zawahiri] America, in a bid to pull the rug from under the jihadist-Islamic resistance against it in the Muslim world, tried to cooperate and coordinate with three parties. One of these parties is a group of people who trade in religion, spread fables and superstitions, and control their followers with claims of being guided by a connection with the Divine’s secrets. This group cooperated with the American occupier before, during, and after the invasion, and under the supervision and direction of the Americans, it formed the basic military formations that support the occupier and assault the mujahidin and Muslim masses in Iraq. This group and its fraudulent leaders pretended to forget the slogans ‘death to America,’ slogans that withered away and were replaced by the slogan ‘cooperation with the occupier to preserve security.” This group abandoned the rule of Shari’ah and tu rne d into the primary talon with which the crusader occupier claws at the body of the Muslim nation in Iraq. This is why this group of charlatans who trade in religion insists on the myth that the occupation will remain so long as there is a resistance.

The Muslim nation must therefore take note and be ware of these people who daub themselves with Islam, and it must speak the truth to their face and tell them that the occupation will leave either under the blows of the mujahidin, or if all the free people of Iraq and its mujahidin turn into traitors and charlatans who, like yourselves, trade in religion in pursuit of some worldly gains, and turn into agents for American intelligence and protectors of crusader-Zionist interests — the occupation will then leave because it would be satisfied that its anti-Muslim interests are being served by the traitors who trade in religion like yourselves. But so long as there remain in the Iraq of the Caliphate and Islam free men who make sacrifices for their religion and seek the pleasure of their lord, the occupation will leave due to the hemorrhaging it will sustain from the strikes of these free men whether the charlatans and crusaders like it or not. These charlatans were exposed in a historic scandal that all the waters of the seas cannot wash away. History will testify that when the crusaders invaded Iraq, the free mujahidin confronted them, but the charlatans who trade in religion colluded with it. They colluded with them deliberately while fully aware of their goals and the sheer ugliness of the treason they commit in pursuit of power, position, and gain. They are criminals who committed a full-fledged crime.

Ibn-al-Jawzi [a 12th century cleric], may God have mercy on his soul, says in his book, Al-Muntadhim, that Sinan Bin-Anas al-Nakh’i attacked Al-Husayn [son of Imam Ali], may God be pleased with him, and stabbed him with a spear, and when Husayn fell, Sinan knelt down to him, cutting his throat and decapitating him. Sinan then went to the house of Amr Ibn-Sa’d and stood at his door calling: Load my steed with silver and gold, for I have killed the veiled master, the best of people in parentage, and the best of them in lineage, to which Amr replied: Are you insane, how dare you say such a thing? Sinan Ibn-Anas al-Nakh’i killed Husayn Bin-Ali, may God be pleased with him, intentionally and premeditatedly knowing all too well who Husayn was and why he was being fought by his enemies. His motives for killing Husayn, may God be pleased with him, were financial, and this brought him the wrath of Allah and His curse and punishment. He stabbed Husayn, may God be pleased with him, with the intent of killing him, and he got what he wanted, and the purpose of his action was fulfilled. So it was a full-fledged crime in which was found criminal intent born out of a criminal motive, which was followed by a criminal act and a criminal result. So it was a full-fledged crime according to all judges of the mankind.

Exactly the same are those charlatans and religion-traders. They intentionally and eagerly cooperated with the Crusader occupation before it reached Iraq in search of the spoils and power while they knew who this Crusader occupation is, what it wants, what its goal is, and what its plans are for enslaving, humiliating, and dividing the Muslim nation and for consolidating Israel and widening its occupation. Then they took part in the occupation’s crimes, supported them in their battles, fought the mujahidin, and cursed them publicly to make the occupation happy.

The result of their intent and act was achieved with the killing and torturing of thousands of Muslims and defending the Crusader forces. So this is also a full-fledged crime like Sinan Bin-Anas al-Nafi’i’s crime of killing Al-Husayn Bin-Ali, may God be pleased with him. It was a full-fledged crime which if shown to any fair judge, would be condemned and punished. And just as Sinan Bin-Anas was not ashamed as he called out to Amr Bin-Sa’d: Load my steed with silver and gold for I killed the mantled chief. I have killed the best of people in parentage and the best of them in lineage.

These charlatans also were not ashamed as they addressed Paul Bremer, Bush, and Zalmay Khalilzad saying: Load our steeds with silver and gold for we have warred against the Muslims in your ranks and under your crucifix. We cursed the mujahidin and incited the people to stop cooperation with them, to inform on them, and fight them instead. So where is our share of the spoils and plunder?

[Interviewer] So this is a historic disgrace which will be related by generation after generation.

[Al-Zawahiri] Yes, without a doubt. It is a historic disgrace which will be passed down from generation to generation just as we know about the treachery of Abu-Righal, the betrayal of Al-Husayn, may God be pleased with him, by the people of Al-Kufah, the betrayal of the Muslims in Iraq by Bin-al-Alqami, the treachery of Khedive Tawfiq in his alliance with the English for the occupation of Egypt, the treachery of Sharif Husayn Bin-Ali and Abd-al-Aziz Al Sa’ud when they colluded with the English against the Ottoman State, the treachery of Al-Sadat in his going to the Knesset and signing the accords of surrender to Israel, the treachery of those affiliated with the previous jihad who are with the Crusader coalition forces led by America in Kabul, and the betrayal of the Muslims in Pakistan and Afghanistan by Musharraf. All of these betrayals are documented and recorded and their perpetrators cannot separate themselves from them nor escape.

Many masks have fallen down. At the same time the Israeli bombers were demolishing villages and houses in Gaza and Lebanon, the traitors in our countries were shaking the hands of the Crusaders, embracing them, currying favor with them, and conspiring with them. Among the most prominent of these conspirators are the rulers of Egypt, the Arabian Peninsula, and Jordan and the traitors in Iraq who shade themselves with the cross of America, the great Satan. You traitors, why do you embrace in Iraq those who kill your brothers in Lebanon? Why do you not fight in Iraq those who tear apart the bodies of those whom you claim are your brothers in Lebanon? Why do you serve and defend in Iraq those who kill those whom you consider to be your brothers in Lebanon? The slogan “Death to America, death to Israel” has gone to be replaced by “Rule from America and peace with Israel.”

Nuri al-Maliki went to beg Washington to keep its troops in Iraq at the same time its missiles were ripping apart the bodies of women and children in Qana and Gaza. It concerns me here to make three serious conclusions which I ask every Muslim to reflect upon, take a stance on, and prepare an answer for his stance on them on the Day of Judgme nt. The first conclusion is that what is being done by the traitors, religion-trading charlatans in Iraq serves the interests of America and moreover directly serves the interests of the Zionist entity and its protection, suppo rt, and expansion by turning Iraq into a stable American base which preserves the safety of Israel’s eastern front. There is no greater service which can be presented to Israel than transforming Iraq into a stable base for America. The second conclusion is that the treachery commented by the religion-trading charlatans in Iraq might be repeated by them in any other country which falls on the Crusaders and Zionists’ list of aggression. The third conclusion is that the religion-selling movement which cooperates with the nation’s enemy cannot be entrusted with the leadership of the nation because it sells the nation to the enemies of Islam in the name of Islam.

[Interviewer] So what is the path to salvation from these pitfalls for those who have fallen into them in – for example – Iraq and Afghanistan?

[Al-Zawahiri] The path is to repent to God and substitute bad deeds with good deeds by returning to the path of Islam and jihad, breaking up with the Americans, helping the mujahidin, and standing in their ranks.

[Interviewer] Do you expect, honorable shaykh, that they will do this?

[Al-Zawahiri] By God, we are only asked to proclaim the message. The Truth Exalted is He says: “So remind, for you are one who reminds.”

[Interviewer] Ok. We move on to the condition of Al-Qa’ida of Jihad Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers [Tanzim Qa'idat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn] after the martyrdom of martyr – as we see him – and commander Abu-Mus’ab al-Zarqawi. How do you see it now?

[Al-Zawahiri] Without a doubt the martyrdom of Abu-Mus’ab al-Zarqawi, God’s mercy be upon him, is a loss to jihad and mujahidin. But Al-Qa’ida of Jihad Organization, praise be to God, is just one of the factions of jihad which is awakening and flourishing in the Muslim nation and spreading in it the concepts of monotheism, jiahd, enjoining good and forbidding evil, honor, and dignity. Abu-Mus’ab is only one of the soldiers of Islam defending the banner of the Prophet, peace be upon him, from the forces of disbelief, treason, and treachery. Zalmay Khalilzad spared us from having to explain when he decided that the activities of Al-Qa’ida in Iraq have not been affected by the killing of Abu-Mus’ab, God’s mercy be upon him. The truth is what the enemies testify to. We are very happy about the transfer of the banner of jihad and resistance to Abu-Hamzah al-Muhajir, may God guide him to every good thing, unite through him the ranks of mujahidin, and aid him and his mujahidin brothers against their enemies from the Crusaders and traitors.

[Interviewer] There is a lot that has been said about the stance of Al-Qa’ida in Iraq on some sectors of the Iraqi people. What is the truth about that, clearly put?

[Al-Zawahiri] Yes, let me be frank and explicit on this very point. The instructions of Shaykh Usama, may God protect him, to the brothers in Iraq, chief amongst them Abu-Mus’ab, may God’s mercy be upon him, were that they focus their efforts on the Americans and neutralize the rest of the powers as best as they could. However, he gave them some freedom of movement, telling them that the witness sees what the absent does not see. He told them that for two reasons. The first was to give them freedom of movement in confronting any current which might ally itself with the Americans against the Muslims in Iraq, whatever its race or sect was. The second reason was to give them freedom of movement against any current causing strife and waging a war of annihilation against the Muslims in Iraq. It has become clear to all that there is a war of annihilation being waged against the Muslims in Iraq and that this war is being carried out by forces under the command of the Iraqi Government. These forces exploit their official status in executing their crimes and massacres and that the Inte r ior Ministry and the security institutions have their own secret prisons in which the Muslims are tortured and where they are killed and their bodies mutilated. This is a matter recognized by all. Even the Americans themselv e s made it public to deny any responsibility for the ugliness.

[Interviewer] But there are groups who accuse you of being the initiators of this conflict and that you are the ones who fanned its flames.

[Al-Zawahiri] This cannot possibly be the case and no intelligent person believes it to be so. It goes without saying that someone busy with fighting the Americans will be most eager than anyone to lessen his enemies and increase his friends. How could he not when he is facing the strongest power in the world. That is the first point. The second point is that in Iraq there are many non-Muslim sects like the Christians, Jews, and Satan’s worshippers, and yet Al-Qa’ida has not done anything to them because Al-Qa’ida in Iraq is busy with jihad against Crusader occupation. So we are against anyone who helps the Americans with actions or words against the Muslims in Iraq. The Truth Exalted is He says: “O you who believe. Take not the Jews and the Christians for you for friends and protectors. They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that runs to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guides not a people unjust. You see how those to whose hearts is a disease run about among them, saying we fear lest a change of fortune bring us disaster. But it may be that Allah will give you victory or a decision from Him, then they will regret the thoughts which they secretly harbored in their hearts.”

As for those who agreed with the Americans before the invasion to rule Iraq in exchange for winking at the Crusader presence in Iraq and encouraging and supporting it and fighting those who resist it, they have the greatest interest in opening new fronts for the mujahidin to lighten the pressure on the Americans. This is a division of roles which has taken place between the Americans and these factions.

[Interviewer] But these forces which you describe as cooperating with the Americans and causing strife are backed by the Americans who are the strongest power in the world, while you are a collection of rebellious groups, and the Americans reassure them of their continued support, so how will you confront them?

[Al-Zawahiri] There are two things which any intelligent person recognizes. The first is that the Americans have often fled and abandoned their allies. And the second is that the mujahidin, by God’s grace, have demolished the borders of Sykes-Picot. The intelligent is he who learns from others.

[Interviewer] Ok, if I were to ask you to sum up your opinion about this complex issue in a few words, what would you say?

[Al-Zawahiri] I say, asking God’s help, that anyone who participates with the Americans in their occupation of Iraq and aggression against the Muslims will be fought by us, with God’s help. As far as anyone who resists the Americans and seeks to establish the rule of Islam in Iraq we are prepared to talk to and come to an understanding with him.

[Interviewer] But in Iraq, America has not depended on the religion-traders only. It has depended on stirring up nationalist feuds and portraying itself as the protector – for example – of the Kurds against the Arab nationalists.

[Al-Zawahiri] Yes, it is regrettable that America has backed with money and weapons some of the secular Kurdish currents which sold the Kurds to the Americans and Jews in the name of defending the Kurds’ rights.

The Kurds have recorded their names in the history of Islam with shining letters. They were the protectors of Islam and the defenders of Jerusalem. They were the stone on which the Crusades broke. It is regrettable that a secular government that is agent of the United States and Israel has come to dominate these Muslim, Mujahidin, strong, and proud people.

[Interviewer] But we should not forget that these parties exploit the crimes of the Iraqi Ba’th Party against the Kurds and portray to them at all Arabs are hostile to the Kurds and that the Jihadist movements and Al-Qa’ida Organization are ally of the Iraqi Ba’th Party and the like of such nonsense.

[Al-Zawahiri] Praise be to God, all the Jihadist movements are ideological enemies not only to the Iraqi Ba’th Party but to all the nationalist and secular trends whose principles conflict with the fundamentals of Islam, which is based on equality between Muslims and the bonds of faith and not on the nationalist spirit. Almighty God says: “O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despise (each other). Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you.” This is the point as far as the faith is concerned. As for the practice, the mujahidin everywhere — from the Philippines to Iraq — have in their ranks Muslims from all countries and races without discrimination between an Arab and non-Arab, white or black. The brother mujahidin Kurds had played heroic roles in confronting the enemies of Islam in Chechenya, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and of course in Iraq.

We in Al-Qa’ida organization have pledged allegiance to the commander of the faithful, Mulla Muhammad Omar, who is not an Arab. So by the grace of God, we are the farthest people from the fanatical nationalist trend. Therefore, I appeal to my brothers in Islam, the Kurds, to renounce these calls which are pro the United States and Israel, and to record an honorable page in the contemporary Islamic history as their predecessors did in the past when they recorded honorable pages in the history of Islam.

[Interviewer] What is Al-Qa’ida’s general concept of jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan?

[Al-Zawahiri] The general concept of the mujahidin in Iraq and Afghanistan is the establishment of an Islamic emirate in each of the two countries, which will be the launching pad for defense of Islam and Muslims and a step toward the revival of caliphate. We should not forget that Jerusalem is a stone’s throw from Baghdad, so if an Islamic emirate is established in Iraq, with the help of God, and become able to penetrate through the treacherous Jordanian entity to stand on the border of Palestine, and God willing if the mujahidin inside and outside Palestine come together, then the greatest conquest and victory will take place.

[Interviewer] How do you see the situation in Afghanistan now?

[Al-Zawahiri] The situation in Afghanistan is very good, thanks be to God. This summer, thanks be to God, is burning the Crusaders in Afghanistan with its flames as they were previously warned by Commander of the Faithful Mulla Muhammad Omar, may God protect him. The Americans have swiftly withdrawn from south and east Afghanistan and pushed forward second-rate Crusaders such as the English, the Canadians, the Dutch, and others to be killed instead of them. After that, the coalition forces withdrew so as to be replaced by the NATO forces in south and east Afghanistan. Blair and his companions are selling the blood of their citizens in order to appease America. I want to draw the attention of the British people that Dr Brydon will not return this time to India because his body will be thrown out to the dogs in Afghanistan.

[Interviewer] Let us return to the Arab region and the United States calls for spreading democracy, and the protests by the journalists and judges in Egypt who demands providing them with assurances. How do see all this that is taking place?

[Al-Zawahiri] The Islamic nation is boiling as a result of the foreign aggression and the domestic repression. This boiling state must be employed in a right way by the vanguards of the nation to transform the nation’s angry energy into an effective and influential movement of change, which will lead the nation to victory, God willing. Therefore, we must know the nature of the wound so that we can treat it properly. Let me give you an example from the surgery field. If there is patient suffer ing from intesti nal blockage, or an abdominal abscess, or a bursting appendix, some sympathizers who do not have real and comprehensive vision about the problem and its seriousness may make an effort in bringing the patient’s temperature down or easing his pain. However, before all this, we must know the cause of the illness, remove it, or treat it. Then, the patient’s temperature will go down and his pain will be relieved.

The same goes for our social and political problems. We should put our hand on the fundamental problem and move forward bravely to solve it. In this case, it will be easy to solve all the problems branching out from it. Our basic problem is the domination of corrupt and rotten regimes, which do not govern by Shar’iah and open the land for the foreign enemy and rampage in the counties. Thus, the basic treatment requires us to bravely confront the alliance of evil made up of the foreign enemy and the corrupt rulers. It is a waste of time to look for a shari’ah rule or freedom or justice in an occupied country run by treacherous agents. The other important thing is that rights are not given but are snatched and they will not be snatched without jihad and sacrifices. Therefore, he who prefers safety cannot seize his right. Al-Tabara’i [an old Muslim poet] says: “The love for safety keeps the person away from glory and tempts him to be lazy. If you inclined to this, you find a tunnel under the ground or a ladder to rise to the sky and stay isolated.” Shawqi [a famous Egyptian poet] says: “He who water and drink of death if the free ones do not drink or give a drink. And no kingdoms can be built without sacrifices and without these sacrifices the rights cannot be attained. Those killed give life to the generations and those captured give freedom to them. And the red freedom has a door that is knocked at by every bloodstained hand.”

The other important thing is that the mujahid who seeks his right does not wait for assurances nor does expect them. Rather, he confronts oppression and corruption and exposes himself to risks and being killed for aiding the truth. If not, then what were the assurances provided by the unbelievers of Quraysh to the prophet, peace be upon him, when he publicly proclaimed his message in the face of the world of polytheism, oppression, and corruption? What were the assurances provided by Yazid [an Umayyad caliph] when Husayn Bin-Ali and Abdallah Bin-al-Zubayr, may God be pleased with them, rose against him? What were the assurances provided by Al-Hajjaj to Sa’id Bin-Jubayr, may God have mercy on him? What were the assurances given by Abu-Muslim al-Khurasani to Ibrahim al-Sa’igh, may God have mercy on him? And what were the assurances given by Al-Mu’tasim to Ahmad Bin-Hanbal, may God have mercy on him? What were the assurances given by Al-Wathiq to Ahmad Bin-Nasr al-Khuza’i, may God have mercy on him? What were the assurances provided by Al-Salih Isma’il to scholar Al-Izz Bin-Abd-al-Salam, may God have mercy on him, when he criticized him for handing over the Muslims’ castles to the Crusaders? What were the assurances provided by Abd-al-Nasir to Sayyid Qutb, may god have mercy on him when he said that the finger that testifies that there is only one God in every prayer cannot write a petition to an oppressor? What were the assurances given by the military judge Major General Samir Fadil to Khalid al-Islambuli, may God have mercy on him, when he shouted at the military court “Yes, I killed Egypt’s pharos”? What were the assurances given by Judge Abd-al-Ghaffar Muhammad to Shaykh Umar Abd-al-Rahman when he told him: “O you judge, make a verdict in accordance with God’s law otherwise you will be the unbeliever, oppressor, and reckless? The only assurance is to strive to please Almighty God and to have confidence in His promise. Holy Koran has immortalized in an entire surah that will be recited until the Domes Day the story of the people of the di tch. The people who testified to the truth in the face of their tyrannical ruler. They were killed for that. This is our book and this is the tradition of our prophet, peace be upon him, and the biography of his companions and his household, may God be pleased with them. This is the history of our imams and leaders. The prophet, peace be upon him, said: “The chief martyr is Hamzah and a man who rose in the face of an unjust ruler and gave him orders and asked him not to do certain things, then the ruler killed him.” The prophet, peace be upon him said: “The best jihad is a word of truth in front of an unjust ruler.” Therefore, it is obligatory to spread awareness in the ranks of the nation that the corruption is deeply-rooted caused by the domination of the Muslim nation’s enemies and the corruption of their proxies. To change this corruption there must be a vanguard that is ready to sacrifice for the sake of God in order to rule by Shari’ah and liberate the homelands from the occupier and liberate the human being from oppression, corruption, and repression. And so that the nation can snatch its right to rule by Shari’ah and choose its leaders and hold them to account we must spread this awareness in the ranks of the nation as a whole.

[Interviewer] Your talk about the need to spread awareness in nation is confirmed by the US announcement during the recent bombing of Lebanon of the plan for the new Middle East. Therefore, the nation in its march for change should be based on its awareness of the fundamentals of monotheism and its understanding of the conspiracies taking place around it.

[Al-Zawahiri] Without doubt. I will comment on what you said. The definition of the Middle East includes Afghanistan. This reveals the extent of the filthy role played by the agents of the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq through the US reform plans. It also shows the need for the Muslim nation’s support through money, opinion, expertise, and information for the mujahidin in these two important fields.

[Interviewer] Speaking about the United States and the spreading of democracy you mentioned that the United States cooperates with three groups to circumvent the Islamic jihadist resistance against it. You first mentioned one group, which you called the charlatans who trade in religion. What are the two other groups?

[Al-Zawahiri] We mentioned the first group, which is the group of the charlatans who trade in religion. As for the second group, it is the group of defeatists, and the third is the group of beggars.

[Interviewer] Amazing. You chose strong words for describing them: Charlatans, defeatists, and beggars.

[Al-Zawahiri] Yes, this is because of the ugliness of what they commit.

[Interviewer] In your view, what is this group of defeatists?

[Al-Zawahiri] After the fall of Ottoman Caliphate a wave of psychological defeatism and ideological collapse spread. And there crept into the people a tendency — though with good intentions — that we should benefit from the status quo to rescue what can be can be rescued and achieve what can be achieved. This trend — with the continuation of the blows dealt to the Muslims — continued to retreat one step after another until in the end they reached the point of pledging allegiance to Husni Mubarak a president of the republic, Ali Abdallah salih as the leader of the faithful, and Abdallah Bin-al-Husayn, leader of Muslims, and Al-Sabah family as those in charge of the Muslims affairs. They entered Kabul on top of the US tanks and under the protection of its bombers and under the shade of its cross. They took [Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip] Erdogan and his companions as an example of success and excellence. They declared their full commitment to the rule of the majority and abandoned the rule of Shari’ah. They defined their affiliation to their nationalist and regional links that pref ers t he national unbeliever than the foreign Muslim. Thus, they adopted a new creed which conflicts with Islam that is based on the rule of the majority, national affiliation, and respect of the Sykes-Picot borders, and loyalty to the nationalist state as opposed to the creed of Islam, which is based on the rule of the Divine shar’iah, the brotherhood of Islam, the integrity of the Islamic land, and the establishment of the caliphate state. So they in fact are striving for the secularization of Islam. And in fact, the secularists are braver than them, although the secularists are actually more cowardly than the atheists, because the atheist declares clearly that he does not believe in religion because he considers it as a false creed, which must be fought and excluded from public and private matters, whereas the secularist is a coward who knows that to openly profess atheism will attract the scorn of wise people and reveal his worn-out stand toward faith. Consequently, the system which he calls for will collapse. Therefore, he calls for removing religion from life and making it a personal matter, and flees from the frank, serious ideological confrontation; namely, that if religion is a false creed, then it must be removed from all walks of life, whether public or private. If Almighty God exists and is the Creator of universe, then just as He is the Creator and Sustainer, then He also must be the Legislator and Ruler. So, if the secularists are more cowardly than the atheists, then you can imagine the condition of those who strive for secularism under the cover of Islam.

[Interviewer] Well, this is a strong doctrinal presentation, and we may make room for it elsewhere to deal with it in full. However, let us concentrate on those whom you call defeatists to what you have mentioned just now about the US attempt to circumvent the mujahid Islamic resistance against the Crusader aggression.

[Al-Zawahiri] I will put my answer in the form of a question, and then I will answer your question.

[Interviewer] Go ahead, please.

[Al-Zawahiri] What can you expect from a group whose mental makeup and disposition allows it to pledge allegiance to [Egyptian President] Husni Mubarak as a president of the republic, [Yemeni President] Ali Abdallah Salih as imam of the Muslims, and [Jordan's King] Abdallah Bin-al-Husayn, [Kuwaiti rulers] Al al-Sabah, [Algerian President] Bouteflika, and [Afghan President] Hamid Karzai as rulers of the Muslims? Is it possible for a group with such a mentality and demeanor to lead the jihad of the Muslim nation in the face of the fiercest Crusade it has ever faced, and in the face of a clique of the most malevolent proxies of the nation’s enemies? This group circumvents the mujahid vanguards of the nation and tries in vain to divert the Muslim masses from it with a fabricated deception to the effect that the violent confrontation with the ruling regimes, which violates the man-made laws imposed by the agent rulers, is forbidden and prohibited. They also evade jihad against the foreign enemy, and permit it, but on two conditions, that it should only be in the occupied country and after permission is given by their local ruler to travel to the battlefield. And then, in the occupied country, like Iraq and Afghanistan, they seek to cooperate with the Crusader occupation authorities in resisting jihad, which they call terrorism, and entering the fake political process under the supervision of the international false witness, the United Nations. So, by God, tell me, how is it possible for jihad to come into being after this ploy or predicament? And the US crusaders could not be happier about these ploys. Let me put this tragedy in a dramatic form so that its ugly dimensions become clear. Let us assume that a group among the youth in these movements became aware of their legal obligation against the nation’s foreign and domestic enemies and decided to carry out this individual duty, the duty of jihad in the cause of God, and so, these faithful young men went to their leaders to demand jihad against the agent ruler who does not rule with the shari’ah, their leaders will, of course forbid them decisively and tell them that we have recognized them as legitimate rulers, and the change can only take place through the elections, then the young men will tell them but the elections are not based on an Islamic constitution and are eventually rigged, then the leaders will reply, but our doctrine, regardless of your argument, is that we do not fight our fellow citizens, and that jihad is only against the foreign enemy. The youth will say to them: “Fine, then let us go to Iraq or Afghanistan.” The elders then will tell them, but on the condition that the ruler agrees, so submit an application to the passport department in which you request the issuing of a passport for jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan. Let us assume that these young men did that and submitted their application to the ruler, and let us assume, which is very impossible, that the ruler sympathized with the mujahidin and agreed on their travel, and provided them with passports, we will see that when these young men returned to their shaykhs, they said: Fine, but you know that we are an international organization, and that we have a very important principle, which is that we do not overstep the regional organization, and that we respect the specific nature of every country–and I ask you to pay attention to this principle of respecting the specific nature of every country, especially since grave sins have been committed with it–the important thing is that their shaykhs divided them into two groups; a group for Iraq, to which they gave a letter to take to the organization in Iraq, and a group for Afghanistan, to which they gave a letter to the retired mujahidin in Afghanistan. So, when the young men reached the leaders of the organization in Iraq and told them, we have come to you for jihad against the Americans, they told them, but Iraq has its specific nature and we cooperated with Bremer in the Governing Council, and now we have agreed on the constitution in the rigged refere ndum, and participated in the rigged parliamentary elections, and we were in need for your efforts then to take part in jihad by pasting our pictures on walls, but thank God that you have reached us at this important stage because we are now performing jihad and struggling by bargaining and making deals under the supervision of Zalmay Khalilzad to get some of the ministries, including the Defense Ministry, and if we do not get the Defense Ministry, we will try to get some posts at the Defense Ministry, and through our men in these posts, we will try to pull some of our youth in the Defense Ministry, and you might be from among them, and if this happens, then it is possible for you to be part of the Defense Ministry forces, and thus, you will receive weapons and training in an official way and from the Americans. Then, the poor young men asked them, and after all this trouble, will we be able to fight the Americans with these weapons? The shaykhs answered disapprovingly, no and thousand no’s, but you will fight the terrorists. As for the group that arrived in Afghanistan, it reached the retired senior mujahidin, and when they handed them the organization’s letter, they welcomed them and were very generous to them. After the greetings and generosity, the youth asked them, when can we fight the Americans? The retirees answered: Afghanistan has its own specific nature, and we entered Kabul with the Americans and under their protection, and then we joined the Loya Jirga and left the Loya Jirga, then we entered the parliament, but the Americans deprived us of the ministries because we are retired mujahidin, but we sought to take some posts in the interior and defense ministries, and through our men there, we might be able to provide you with some weapons and training. The young men asked them: Where are your old weapons, which were piled like mountains? The retirees replied: We handed them over to the United Nations as part of the disarmament program. The young men the n asked them: Why didn’t you hand them over to the Taliban? The retirees replied with disgust: Because they are agents of Pakistan and Pakistan is an enemy of Islam. The young men replied while their patience had almost run out: And after all these possibilities, if the weapons reach our hands, will we fight the Americans with them? The retirees disapprovingly: No, you will fight Al-Qa’ida and the Taliban, because Al-Qa’ida is an agent of the United States, and the Taliban is an agent of Pakistan.

[Interviewer] But among the arguments of the leaders of these movements is that your method of violent armed confrontation is unsuccessful and has led to disastrous results, and that yours is a start-from-the-top method, which seeks to change the society by changing its leadership, which is a method that, even if it were to succeed, will not survive, whereas their method depends on wisdom and continuous, calm work, and has moved from one success to another, and that they strive to change society from its grassroots by attracting them to Islam, which is a method which guarantees the continuation of any Islamic system that comes to power.

[Al-Zawahiri] This is a clear confusion, which ignores facts and evades the main point of dispute. Without going into details, I would like to clarify that our fundamental point of difference with these movements, the captives of the culture of defeat and brokenness, is not over whether the confrontation is useful or not, rather, our fundamental difference with them is over their backsliding in the faith. We do not have a major dispute with those who call for avoiding confrontation now because its causes and means do not exist in a particular country or region, and if this difference does exist, it will be restricted to looking at the feasibilities and most appropriate methods. They might be right, or we might be right. But, as for he who forbids the jihad of the agent apostate rulers, recognizes the rule of the majority and considers it as his religion, believes in national affiliations, and raises them above the brotherhood of Islam, submits to the divisions of Sykes Picot, abandons the rule of shari’ah and the establishment of the Caliphate, pledges allegiance to the traitors, the enemies of the nation as rulers of the Islamic countries, cooperates with the Crusader invaders, and curses the mujahidin and describes them as criminals, out difference with him is not a dispute about methods, but rather, it is a dispute about the creed of Islam from which he is breaking away.

[Interviewer] But you cannot deny that these movements have wide popular support?

[Al-Zawahiri] The Sufi paths and soccer clubs have even wider popular support.

[Interviewer] But the Sufi paths and soccer clubs do not have sincere members with a high degree of competence, education, and organization?

[Al-Zawahiri] I do not deny that many sincere people, as a result of the vacuum which exists in the Islamic sphere, and as a result of the lack of sacrifices in these methods, have abandoned themselves to these organizations to discharge their energies that reject corruption. But these supporters who possess sincerity and a desire to make sacrifices for Islam must be honest to themselves. And the first thing they must remember is that every human will come alone to his Lord on the Day of Judgment. Almighty God says: “And everyone will come to him solitarily on the Day of Resurrection.” [Koranic verse] And he must know that his leader and organization will be of no help to him on the Day of Resurrection. So he must prepare a reply to that terrible situation. We ask God safety for us and for the Muslims in it. Every one of them should prepare an answer to the question: Are the mujahidin criminals as your leaders depict them? And, are Husni Mubarak, Karzai, Ali Abdallah Salih, and Abdallah Bin-al-Husayn legitimate rulers like your leaders pledged allegiance to them?

[Interviewer] So what do you want from the supporters of these Movements?

[Al-Zawahiri] I want them to be honest with themselves, their organizations, and their leaders and to ask them: Why do you forbid us from perform jihad against the Crusaders? Why do you recognize the legitimacy of the secular and criminal regimes of treachery and corruption? Why have you abandoned the rule of Shari’ah, the brotherhood of Islam, the unity of Islamic lands, and the efforts to establish the Caliphate and have reverted to the majority rule, the national affiliation, the allegiance to the territorial state, and the division of the Muslims? Why have you cooperated with the Crusader occupier in Afghanistan and Iraq? Why are you impressed by Erdogan and praise him while he is the one who recognizes Israel, signs security agreements with it, takes part in its military exercises, and prides himself on his secularism and estrangement from Islam? I do not ask them to take our words for granted, rather what I have said is evidence held against them, for which each of them will be held accountable on the Day of Resurrection since there is no translator interceding between them and God. So, they should mull over our words, reflect on them, and act according to what they deem consistent with Shar’iah.

[Interviewer] Well, this is your point of view regarding those whom you described as defeatist. In your opinion, who is the group of beggars?

[Al-Zawahiri] They are the ones whom Imam Abdullah Bin-Mubarak, may God have mercy on him, exposed when he said: Was the religion corrupted by anyone other than the kings and the scholars of evil and its monks? Those who sell their religion for positions, salaries, visas, and citizenships, like this one who denounces violence but permits Muslims to fight Muslims in the ranks of the American Army; like those who take pride in their British citizenships and gather in front of the Parliament after the blessed London raid to declare their loyalty to Elizabeth, head of the Church of England; like that one who approves the surrender accord with Israel and recognizes Yasir Arafat as a ruler of the Muslims; like the one who insults the mujahidin day and night and receives the Israeli ambassador and chief rabbi in his office and permits France to forbid Muslim women from covering their heads in schools and hands Wafa Qustantin [wife of an Egyptian priest who converted to Islam] over to be tortured in the prisons of the monasteries.

[Interviewer] Do these three groups share any common characteristics?

[Al-Zawahiri] Yes, they have three things in common: Abandoning the rule of Shari’ah, recognizing the legitimacy of the corrupt status quo, and cursing and abusing the muhjahidin.

[Interviewer] But, there is a group that you have not mentioned in your talk tonight, namely the group of the backtracking leaders in the Egyptian Al-Jama’ah al-Islamiyah .

[Al-Zawahiri] Those have condemned themselves by themselves. How can I respond to those who say that [late Egyptian President] Anwar al-Sadat died as a martyr and regrets his killing? How can I respond to those who consider Husni Mubarak as a ruler of the Muslims? What can I say to those who say: We used to give the text [of the Koran] precedence over the interests, but now we give precedence to the interests over the text, and I do not know what they will say tomorrow? What can I say to those who say that Al-Qa’ida is the one that provoked America to strike at the Muslims? What can I say to those who say that Taliban missed the opportunity to avail themselves of the benefits of the US proposal to extradite Bin Ladin? How can I respond to those who say that they will inform the security agencies about their brothers who do not accept to backtrack their positions? Those who say that do not need a response, they need preaching. They need someone to remind them of the Hadith of the Prophet, peace be upon him, who says: “Among what has reached the people from the w ords of the first prophethood: If you are not ashamed, then do as you wish.” Praise is due to God for we have been spared from responding to them by their eminences Shaykh Umar Abd-al-Rahman and Shaykh Rifa’i Taha, may God free them both, Shaykh Abd-al-Akhir Hammad, Shaykh Muahmamd Mustafa al-Muqri, and Shaykh Muhammad al-Islambuli from the notables of Al-Jama’ah al-Islamiyah who are have been adhering to the truth.

[Interviewer] But they claim that Dr Umar Abd-al-Rahman, may God free him, supported them in their positions?

[Al-Zawahiri] No, His Eminence Shaykh Umar Abd-al-Rahman, may God free him, withdrew his support for their initiative after the truth about it [their positions] became clear to him. So, America stepped up its blockade at him. With this despicable treatment of him and the blockade it imposed on him, America is directing an insult to every Muslim. This can only be explained in the framework of the Jewish-Crusader rancor that simmers in their hearts. So, I call on every Muslim to seize every opportunity afforded him to take revenge of America for the imprisonment of Shaykh Umar Abd-al-Rahman. Let them take as their example in that Abu-Mus’ab al-Zarqawi, may God have mercy on him, who dedicated a raid to the name of Shaykh Umar Abd-al-Rahman.

[Interviewer] But, is it possible that the majority of Al-Jama’ah al-Islamiyah with its untainted history of Da’wah [call] and jihad has really realized what these backtracking leaders have realized?

[Al-Zawahiri] Certainly not, thanks to God’s grace. I am honored here to convey to the Muslims all over the Islamic world the good news on that an important group of Al-Jama’ah al-Islamiyah’s brothers have joined Al-Qa’ida of Jihad Organization. I think you in As-Shahab Foundation are helping to release this good news gradually as circumstances permit.

[Interviewer] Yes, with God’s grace. But, we were talking about other good news before the interview?

[Al-Zawahiri] Yes, it is some great news, thanks to the grace of God: Our Amir, mujahid Shaykh and lion of Islam Usama Bin Ladin, may God protect him, has instructed me to give the good news to Muslims in general, and my brothers the mujahidin everywhere that the Salafi Group for Call and Combat has joined Al-Qa’ida of Jihad Organization. So, praise is due to God, praise is due to God, and praise is due to God for this blessed alliance, which we ask God that it will be a bone in the throats of the Americans and French Crusaders and their allies that would bring on them distress, trepidation, and dejection in the hearts of the traitorous apostate sons of France. We beseech Him Almighty to guide our brothers at the Salafi Group for Call and Combat to success in order to crush the pillars of the Crusader alliance, especially their old immoral leader, America. All praise is due to God, first and last. I seize the opportunity provided by this good news to remind myself and all my brothers who work to serve Islam, help the Muslims, and confront the Zionist-Crusader campaign and its agents of the necessity of unity since it is the gateway to victory and it is the legal duty of the Muslims when facing their enemies.

The Truth, Exalted is he, says: “O you who believe when you meet a force, be firm and remember Allah much that you may prosper. And obey Allah and His Messenger and do not dispute among yourselves lest you lose heart and you power depart and persevere for Allah is with those who persevere.”

[Interviewer] The past period has witnessed important developments in Somalia. Moreover, the Islamic orientation of its Islamic people has come to the fore strongly, rejecting the American Crusader’s presence in Somalia. How do you comment on that?

[Al-Zawahiri] This is the result of the response of the Somali people to the call for establishing a rule based on Shari’ah and the blessing of security and suppression of corruption they felt after implementing the rule of Shari’ah. It is a result of the Muslim Somali peoples’ dignity and defiance that reject the presen c e of the American Crusaders and their underlings and that made the Americans taste the bitterness of defeat. That why I call on the Muslim Somali people to reject the American Crusader’s presence in Somalia and to use their strength to strike at America’s underlings in Somalia, to seek help from God, and to confront the Ethiopian forces that are invading Muslim Somalia, and to bury them there. They should realize that it is not only their duty to God to establish the Muslim government in Somalia, but also it is their duty to expel the Zionist Crusader’s presence from the entire Horn of Africa and back their Muslim brothers in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Palestine by delivering crushing blows to the Zionist Crusader presence in the Horn of Africa. May God guide them to success to help Islam and Muslims.

[Interviewer] Well, we move on to the Western peoples. Do you have a message for them?

[Al-Zawahiri] Yes, I tell them your leaders are concealing from you the true size of disaster which will shock you. The days are pregnant and they will give birth to new events with God’s permission and guidance. I tell them: You have provided us with all the legal and rational reasons to fight you and punish you. You have committed ugly crimes, breached treaties that you used to impose on others to abide by. For our part, we have repeatedly warned you and repeatedly offered a truce with you. So, we now have legal and rational justifications to continue fighting you until your power is destroyed or you give in and surrender. I tell them: You should not bother yourselves with defending your forces in Iraq and Afghanistan because they are deemed to be defeated. They are all but defeated in fighting that battles that are hindering the nation. Rather, you should reinforce your defenses in two regions: The first is in the Gulf, from where you will be expelled, God willing, after the defeat in Iraq at which point your economic ruin will be achieved. The second is in Israel, because the jihadist reinforcements are getting closer to it, with God’s help and power. Your defeat there will put an end to the contemporary Zionist-Crusader supremacy. Since the Jews know that it will be their turn after the defeat in Iraq, they are attempting with all the influence, wealth, and propaganda in their power to extend your stay in Iraq as long as possible and regardless of the losses inflicted on you. The Jews know that the main reason for the catastrophes that are befalling you one after another is your backing and support for them. This is why they try to conceal the facts as much as they can. From the ploys they use in concealing facts is their portrayal of the mujahidin as half-mad, bloodthirsty maniacs who will continue to fight you until the last one of you. Whenever the mujahidin address you with the language of reason, they confuse you and divert you from that in order to keep you in the battlefield to be killed for their protection.

[Interviewer] Yes, it has been circulated in the media that you have not made a serious offer to the West, that you want to fight just for the sake of fighting, and that you want war to the very end?

[Al-Zawahiri] This is misleading. We have repeatedly declared our political offer to the West, but the leaders of the West, especially Bush and Blair, are keen on causing confusion about that. Shaykh Usama Bin Ladin, may God protect him, offered a truce to the West and America. I have already told the West that the way to peace is the withdrawal from our countries, stopping the plunder of our resources, and ending its support for the corrupt governments in our lands.

[Interviewer] Speaking of the plunder of resources, grievances, and the oppressed ones in the world, in recent statements by Al-Qa’ida of Jihad calls for supporting the oppressed in the world have been repeated. Is this a new Al-Qa’ida approach?

[Al-Zawahiri] No, this is a confirmed jurisprudence-based law. God, the exalted, said in Hadith Qudsi:”O my servants, I have forbidden oppression for myself, and forbidden it for you, so do not oppress each other.”

And the prophet, peace be upon him, took part in the (alliance of the favors?) in Mecca before his noble mission and praised it after he was sent, peace be upon him, by saying:” I took part in the alliance of Al-Mutayyibin with my uncles when I was a boy, and I would not renege on it for any price.”

I invite all of America’s victims to Islam, the religion which rejects injustice and treachery. If they don’t convert to Islam, then they should at least take advantage of Muslims’ defensive campaign to repel America’s aggression against them and overcome them, each in his own way, under his own banner, and with whatever is at his disposal.

This is their historic chance, because America is reeling from the blows of the mujahidin in Iraq and Afghanistan, thanks to God.

[Interviewer] Very well; If I ask you now five years after the New York and Washington raids to summarize to me your vision of the Al-Qa’ida of Jihad group. What would you say?

[Al-Zawahiri] Depending on God, I say that God has made Al-Qa’ida successful in convening its message to the Muslim nation which responded favorably with it. God has enabled it to expand and spread. Many groups have joined Al-Qa’ida some of which have been announced and others have not. This is all thanks to God’s favor and the blessing of the blood of martyrs, may God accept them as martyrs.

I don’t forget in this regard to pray God to accept the martyrdom of the 19 heroes whom God made a means to break America’s arrogance and change the path of history. This is a favor from God which he confers on whomever he wishes. I also pray God to aid us free imprisoned Muslims who pave the way for granting victory to Islam through their suffering, sacrifices, and suffering. These are spearheaded by the symbol of jihad, preaching, knowledge, and work in age; namely, Shaykh Umar Abd-al-Rahman, may God release him. God made him an authority over the beggar clergymen of the rulers who are relentlessly seeking life. The same applies to Shaykh Sa’id Bin-Sa’ir and all imprisoned Muslims. I pray God to hasten their relief and our relief. I assure them that releasing them is our obligation. We pray God to help us fulfill it.

[Interviewer] In conclusion, do you have a message to the Muslim nation?

[Al-Zawahiri] I say to the Muslim nation: Support your mujahid sons everywhere because they are your solid shield and impregnable fortress. I urge Muslim youths to join jihad battlefields. I also offer my condolences to my mujahid brothers in Chechnya on the martyrdom of hero Shamil Basayev, may God accept him as a martyr.

I also incite Muslims in Pakistan to topple Musharraf and to confront him through all positive and negative means. I also urge them to support their mujahid brothers in Afghanistan. I advise each Muslim to recall God’s words; namely: “O you who believe! Preserve in patience and constancy, vie in such perseverance, strengthen each other, and fear Allah, that you may prosper.” [Koranic verse]

I also advise all those who found justice and benefit in these words to spread them as much as he can. God is our goal, and he guides to the right path. We finally thank God, the lord of mankind, and peace be upon Prophet Muhammad, his kinfolk, and companions.

[Interviewer] At the need, we would like to thank Shaykh Ayman Al-Zawahiri for his contribution and we pray God to grant us, him, and Muslims success in doing what Allah likes and approves of. Peace be upon you.

[Al-Zawahiri] Peace be upon you.

Category: (Military) Press Release and Terrorism.

September 26, 2006

Gen. Abizaid on CNN’s The Situation Room

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 10:24 pm

CNN – Gen. Abizaid.

WOLF: Hard-pressed U.S. Troops face a raging insurgency in Iraq . A Taliban comeback in Afghanistan . The hunt for Osama bin laden and the possibility of military action against Iran . Is the U.S. Military central command stretched too thin? And joining us now is the U.S. Military commander of the central command, [G]eneral John Abizaid. You got a tough job, [G]eneral [A]bizaid. Not only [I]raq , but [A]fghanistan, the war on terror, [I]ran. I don’t know how you get through it, but let’s start going through some of these issues beginning with your priority number one right now, presumably [I]raq. What do you have, about 140,000 [U].S. Troops there right now?

ABIZAID: That’s correct, [W]olf. Slightly over 140,000. About 142,000. There’s well over 300,000 [I]raqis under arms now as well working for the [I]raqi government. About 23,000 [A]llied [T]roops on the ground. Pretty substantial [M]ilitary force there.

WOLF: There are a lot of experts who say it’s not enough. That if you really want to get the job done, you need twice as many [U].S. Troops.

ABIZAID: Well, [I] think those experts want the [U].S. Troops to do all the work, and [G]eneral [C]asey and [I] don’t want [U].S. Troops to do all the work. It’s very, very clear to both of us that in order to win in [I]raq, the [I]raqis have to assume more and more responsibility[;] and they’re doing that[,] and we intend to keep doing that.

WOLF: It looks like they’re a long way off from being able to get the job done. They have desertion rates and enormous problems with the [I]raqi [M]ilitary. I heard yesterday they have 300,000 [T]roops in the [I]raqi [A]rmy right now, but you wouldn’t know it.

ABIZAID: Look, [W]olf, [I] know where we started. We started with zero in the [I]raqi [I]rmy and police. Now we’re up to well over 300,000. They have their good days. They have their bad days. Iraqi troops are fighting and dying for their country at double the rate that our own troops are taking casualties. The [I]raqi [T]roops become more and more effective over time. No doubt there have been some instances where [I]raqi units have failed to perform their duties, but it’s getting better over time. We’re making progress in that regard, and that’s the most important thing can [I] say.

WOLF: The president keeps saying he relies on you and [G]eneral [C]asey, the commander in [I]raq, for advice. That if you say to him, we need more troops, he will give you more troops. Are you ready to tell the president you need more troops?

ABIZAID: No, [I] just talked to [G]eneral [C]asey about it the other day. We’ve got a [R]eserve formation that’s down in the [K]uwait area. We’ve got additional [R]eserves that belong to me in the [A]rabian [G]ulf area. We don’t see a need to commit them to the fight yet, and until they’re committed, [w]e don’t see a need to ask for more you should [at] the present circumstances. On the other hand, this notion that troop levels are static is not true. Never has been true, and it won’t be true. We’ll ask for what we need when we need it, but it’s key, [W]olf, that the [I]raqi [M]ilitary take on more and more responsibility. It’s a hard thing to do. It’s hard to have a [U].S. Formation in the same area that could do the job and an [I]raqi [U]nit that’s not quite as ready doing the same job, and letting them get through it.

WOLF: If you asked for more [T]r[oo]ps — if you asked the [D]efense [S]ecretary, [D]onald [R]umsfeld, or the president, for more troops, have they ever turned you down?

ABIZAID: No. There’s certainly been staffing actions that have taken place where certain types of units weren’t available, but by and large, any amount of troops that we’ve asked for have shown up on the battlefield.

WOLF: And the other criticism sometimes that’s leveled is you are afraid to ask for more troops because of the political pressure on you. Don’t ask, that’s the word coming from the [P]entagon or the [W]hite [H]ouse.

ABIZAID: You know, [W]olf, if [I] were afraid, [I] wouldn’t be in this job, and [I]‘m not afraid of asking for what [I] need. I absolutely, positively want to win just like [G]eneral [C]asey and all the other [C]ommanders in the field want to. We’ll ask for what we need. It’s not a matter of getting promoted. It’s not a matter of going to another job. It’s a matter of doing the job th[e] at way we see it needs to be done.

WOLF: You saw the intelligence report from that [M]arine [C]olonel in the al [A]nwar [P]rovince who said militarily it possibly could be run if you committed another division, 6,000-16,000 troops, but the situation there, which is a huge western part of [I]raq, is already lost.

ABIZAID: Wolf, this war needs to be won politically and militarily. They need to move together. It’s not a matter of the application of [M]ilitary [F]orces only. You’ve got to have governance moving forward. You have to take down the militias. Have you to apply [M]ilitary [F]orces when you need to. Over time you need to apply more and more [I]raqi [M]ilitary and governance power to the equation. We can do that.

WOLF: Have you given up on the al [A]nbar [P]rov[idences?]

ABIZAID: [I] have not. But the clear priority for [M]ilitary action right now is [B]aghdad, for obvious reasons.

WOLF: And building a trench around the Iraqi [C]apitol with 28 checkpoints to prevent suicide bombers and others from getting in?

ABIZAID: I think it’s a misnomer to say we’re building a trench all the way around Baghdad. We are controlling access in and out in a very, very specific number of locations that we’ve worked out with the Iraqi police and the Iraqi [D]efense [F]orces.

WOLF: When you testified in [A]ugust, [A]ugust 3rd, before the U.S. Congress, [I] want to play for you and for our viewers what you said about a civil war.

ABIZAID: Sure.

ABIZAID: The sectarian violence is probably as bad as [I] have seen it in [B]aghdad in particular and that if not stopped, it is possible that [I]raq could move towards civil war.

WOLF: Now, you know a lot of people are already saying, for all practical purposes, this is a civil war between the [S]hia and the [S]unni?

ABIZAID: I know you can argue this until the cows come home, but it just — it just won’t work. I mean, if the [A]rmy is holding together, if the government is holding together, if people in the [I]raqi government are confident that they can move forward towards greater stability, if we are confident that the [I]raqi [A]rmed [F]orces will get better, [I] think we can prevent civil war.

WOLF: On a daily basis, dozens of bodies show up at the [B]aghdad morgue mutilated, tortured, drilled. It’s as if this situation is getting worse rapidly on a daily basis.

ABIZAID: Well, [I] understand how it’s easy to just look at the violence and come to the conclusion that things are only going to get worse, but [I] don’t come to that conclusion. I come to the conclusion that [I]raqis are fighting and dying for their country, that the government has pledged their sacred honor and their future to making this work. Their lives are on the line. You see numerous [I]raqi officials come through [W]ashington lately, and every one of them shows confidence and the ability to get things done. Now, [I] know which [I] testified back in [A]ugust, since then [I] have been in [B]aghdad, [I] have been on the ground. We’re certainly not out of the woods yet with regard to sectarian violence in [I]raq. It is difficult, but in the areas that we’ve employed [M]ilitary [F]orces, it shows a slight increase of improvement. It will take some months before we’re able to say whether or not we’re having an affect. Things in a counter insurgency violence, as you well know, take time to mat[ter] politically and militarily, and we’re confident with the measures we’re taking now, we can be successful.

WOLF: One of our reporters in [B]aghdad, [M]ichael [W]ear, just out and said there’s real fear embedded with [U].S. Troops, went that the [I]raqi [M]ilitary right now is penetrated with moles from some of the militia, largely the [S]hia militia of [M]uqtada al [S]adr, and that [A]merican [T]roops are worried that sensitive information involving the lives of [U].S. Forces could be jeopardized by these moles, presumably, throughout the [I]raqi [M]ilitary and the [P]olice force.

ABIZAID: I wouldn’t say they’re throughout the [M]ilitary. I think that the [P]olice force is a well-recognized fact that the [P]olice forces have been infiltrated by militia interests that have the interests of their militia above that of the state. That’s recognized by the [P]rime [M]inister. It’s recognized by the [P]resident. It’s recognized by our [C]ommanders. It’s recognized by the [M]inister of the [I]nterior. We’ve got to work on this. It’s very, very important that loyalty to the state take priority over any alliance to any sectarian group. Over time [I] believe that we will isolate that infiltration and eradicate it.

WOLF: The [U].S. Ambassador in [B]aghdad, you work very closely with him, and he said publicly that [I]ran is playing a very negative role right now in [I]raq, fomenting the sectarian violence. I want you to turn around and look at a picture that came in last week when the [P]rime [M]inister of [I]raq met with the president mahmoud all hmadinedjad and say is this why the [men] and women went to war, so there could be this relationship existing between [I]ran, a country that the [U].S. [s]ays supports terrorism, and [I]raq?

ABIZAID: Look, the question for us is, ["][W]ill [I]raq emerge as a member — a responsible member of the community of nations in the region? Will [I]raq be a member of the [A]rab [L]eague? Will it play its role in the region in a country that respects the rights of its own people and is not conducive to terrorism?["] I believe that that’s absolutely what [P]rime [M]inister [M]aliki intends to do. He will not allow his country to be dominated by [I]ran. He will not allow his country to be dominated by special interests. Is he going to build an [I]raq for all [I]raqis[?] [A]nd it’s a hard thing to do. They can do it.

WOLF: Did that picture bother you?

ABIZAID: There’s nothing that bothers me after as long as [I] have spent in the [M]iddle [E]ast.

WOLF: And can you see much more of this exclusive interview with [G]eneral [A]bizaid right here in “[T]he [S]ituation [R]oom” during our 7:00 [P].M. Eastern hour. Among other things, we’ll broaden the interview to discuss the war in [A]fghanistan, the war on terror, the hunt for bin [L]aden, and the possibility of a [U].S. Military strike against [I]ran’s nuclear facilities. More in my interview with [G]eneral [A]bizaid coming up 7:00 [P].M. Eastern.

Category: (Military) Press Release and Interviews.

Iraq Army and Coalition Soldiers Discover Weapons Cache

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 9:53 pm

TIKRIT, Iraq – Soldiers and Paratroopers from the 1st Company, 4th Iraqi Army Division and Delta Company, 2nd Battalion, 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment, discovered a weapons cache during Operation Delta Snag on Sept. 14 in Salah ad Din province, northwest of Samarra.

Iraqi soldiers led the mission in which they discovered more than 300 82 mm mortar rounds, 79 fuses, seven 57 mm anti-aircraft rounds, four 130 mm mortar rounds and a cell phone. Three individuals were also detained during the Iraqi-led operation.

“The commander, 1st Company, 4th IAD and his company demonstrated their increasing capabilities and commitment to taking complete control of this sector,” said Capt. Brian Roeder, commander, Company D, 2-505 PIR. “They are capable of conducting these missions with minimal U.S. involvement.”

An explosive ordnance team and weapons intelligence team were dispatched to handle the munitions, which were detonated in place at the cache site.

“This is a significant find for us. Besides making significant progress in defeating indirect capabilities of anti-Iraqi forces, Delta Company and 1st Company have eliminated literally hundreds of potential IEDs from the enemy’s inventory,” Maj. Brian K. Flood, executive officer, 2-505 PIR. “This is a huge boost for the safety of civilians and security forces in Salah Ad Din.”

There were no injuries or damage to IA or CF Soldiers during Operation Delta Snag which continued through Friday.

Category: (Military) Press Release and Iraq.

Older Posts »
  • Archives

  • Blog at WordPress.com.