Help me move all of my blogs

October 3, 2006

Gen. Abizaid interview w/Lehrer of PBS’s Newshour

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 11:27 pm

Entire interview on PBS.org.

JIM LEHRER: And now to our interview with Army General John Abizaid, commander of the Central Command, which includes all U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan . I talked with him earlier today.

General, welcome. U.N. Secretary-General Annan said the other day that, if current trends continue, Iraq could break down into a full-scale civil war. Is he right?

GEN. JOHN ABIZAID, Top U.S. Commander in the Middle East: I think current trends today look certainly better than when I testified back in August. The situation is improving somewhat.

Certainly, there’s a lot of sectarian violence. I believe that we’ve got the military capacity and the Iraqis have the political will to get things under control. And I think it will start moving towards stability slowly but surely.

JIM LEHRER: Why can’t the sectarian violence be stopped?

GEN. JOHN ABIZAID: The sectarian violence is very, very difficult to control, because it involves very small, cellular groups of death squads that move about the city, that move into pre-designated targets that they’ve already selected, that has already been surveilled, that have certainly been well-known to various people that are plotting to get these particular people.

And they go in and get them. And then, when they can’t get their designated targets, they go after completely random targets, so it’s a very, very difficult military security problem that’s tough to defend against.

JIM LEHRER: And you’re saying that’s getting better? It seems, in the last several weeks, at least on our program every day, we’ve been reporting more and more bodies found, people being tortured. There seems to be on the increase, but you’re saying it’s getting better?

GEN. JOHN ABIZAID: It’s certainly better in the areas where we’ve applied military forces. The overall numbers show a slight decrease; I wouldn’t say it’s substantial. But in the areas where we’ve been operating, in the Doura district and the Amiriyah district and others…

JIM LEHRER: In Baghdad ?

GEN. JOHN ABIZAID: … in Baghdad . And Baghdad ’s really the key problem. As a matter of fact, 80 percent to 90 percent of the sectarian difficulties that take place in Iraq take place within a 30-mile radius of Baghdad .

In those areas that we’ve been operating with U.S. forces and Iraqi forces — and we continue to operate — there is a decrease. But we’re not everywhere. We’re moving step by step, section by section, and it will take some time. We will begin to really see whether or not we’re being successful in a month or two.

Military News

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 1:12 pm

OMGoodness! I have taken the time to write them on the other site, but I forgot to bring them over here. Sorry about that.

Iraq takes charge of Dhi Qar province.
This is such a great article. You guys are doing so much good!
What Extremists Are Saying.
Yada yada yada.
Gen. Abizaid on CNN’s The Situation Room.
This was a good one!
Iraq Army and Coalition Soldiers Discover Weapons Cache.
You guys just keep doing a great job. Don’t quit now. We’re going to woop ‘em. :)
Dhi Qar: Rich past, hopeful future.
Very impressive. It is so nice to hear about the good that is happening in Iraq. I’m very proud of all of you.

Poll finds Australian neighbor gap

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 5:59 am

Poll finds Australian neighbor gap

SYDNEY, Australia (CNN) — Australians believe Indonesia is a dangerous source of Islamic terrorism, a new opinion poll has found.

Indonesians, on the other hand, believe Australia tends to try to interfere in Indonesia’s affairs too much, according to findings released Monday by the Lowy Institute, a Sydney-based think tank.

A majority of people in both countries agree it is “very important” that they work to develop a close relationship, according to the poll. And both see the United States playing the role of global policeman more than it should be.

The Lowy poll of Australians had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent. The organization’s survey of Indonesians had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percent.

The landmark opinion poll shows a relationship between two very different countries that is sometimes under strain, but with some grounds for optimism.

Under Prime Minister John Howard, Australia has been a staunch ally of the United States and has committed troops to Afghanistan and the war in Iraq.

Under President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation, has been at the center of the battle against terrorism in Southeast Asia.

As the site of a spate of deadly terrorist acts such as the Bali bombings of 2002 and 2005, Indonesia figures largely in Australian security concerns.

The Lowy Institute survey of 1,000 Australian respondents found a majority agreed that “Indonesia is a dangerous source of Islamic terrorism” and that “Australia is right to worry about Indonesia as a military threat.”

They also believe that Indonesia essentially is controlled by the military, but nonetheless believe Indonesia has benefited from having Australia as a stable and prosperous neighbor.

Reliable friend
Australians believe their country — which was one of the biggest donors to the reconstruction effort after the devastating tsunami hit Aceh province in December 2004 — has shown itself to be a reliable long-term friend to Indonesia.

Australians’ feelings for Indonesia fall exactly in the middle of a 0-100 scale, with a score of 50. Among 15 countries, Britain was the mostly warmly regarded by Australians, with a score of 74, followed by Singapore 65, Japan 64, Papua New Guinea 63, the United States and India on 62 and China on 61. Iraq, 44, Iran and North Korea (both 43) were at the bottom.

For Indonesians, the country it viewed most warmly was Malaysia, with a score of 66, followed by Japan 64, Singapore 59, China 58, India 56 and the United States and Britain, both on 54. Australian ranked in the next group with South Korea and Iran on 51. For Indonesia, the lowest three of the 15 countries were Papua New Guinea 45, East Timor 43 and Israel 39.

Among Indonesians, Australia’s role in the formation of the now independent nation of East Timor and more recently, its attitude to the Indonesian state of (West) Papua, are sources of tension.

A majority of 1,200 Indonesians respondents thought that “Indonesia is right to worry that Australia is seeking to separate the province of Papua from Indonesia.”

Indonesians also think that Australia’s policy towards the region is shaped too heavily by its alliance with the United States.

While 47 percent of Australians think relations between the two countries are getting worse, Indonesian respondents are more inclined to see the relationship getting better. They also think that Australia’s motives in helping Indonesia fight the threat of terrorism are “mostly good.”

Seventy-seven percent of Australian respondents said it was “very important” that Australia work together to develop a close relationship, while 22 percent thought the countries were too different to develop such a relationship.

Among Indonesian respondents, the corresponding figures were 64 percent and 36 percent.

Sixty-one percent of Indonesian respondents thought the war in Iraq had worsened America’s relations with the Muslim world. In Australia, the corresponding figure was 91 percent.

The top four threats for Australians were perceived to be international terrorism, 73 percent; the possibility of unfriendly countries becoming nuclear powers, 70 percent; global warming, 68 percent; and Islamic fundamentalism, 60 percent. There was no similar question asked in the Indonesian survey.

The opinion polls were conducted in Indonesia and Australia between June 19 and July 6, 2006.

U.N. front-runner touts his inner toughness

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 5:45 am

U.N. front-runner touts his inner toughness

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — The South Korean foreign minister who is front-runner to become U.N. secretary-general first dreamed of becoming a diplomat when he met President Kennedy at the White House in 1962.

As an 18-year-old student, Ban Ki-moon visited Washington on a program organized by the American Red Cross. His visit with Kennedy is captured in a black-and-white photo that shows Ban, then 18, smiling among students from other countries as the president spoke.

Ban’s trip long ago to the U.S. led to more than just his future vocation. His rural hometown of Chungju in central South Korea was so proud of their native son that he was honored on his departure by students at a girls’ high school. One of those students — who presented him with bamboo strainers, a traditional symbol of good luck — became his wife.

Ban, 62, is gentle and soft-spoken and values relations with other people. Some call him a natural-born diplomat who has the ability to avoid making enemies.

Secretary-General Kofi Annan steps down from the post on December 31, and the U.N. Security Council has set an October 9 date to pick his successor. The 192-nation General Assembly must approve the council’s choice — which it has traditionally done without debate or protest.

On Monday afternoon, Ban’s dream took another step forward when he cemented his position to succeed Annan, becoming the only one of six candidates to escape a veto in an informal U.N. Security Council ballot while securing 14 votes in favor.

“It is quite clear that from today’s straw poll that Minister Ban Ki-moon is the candidate that the Security Council will recommend to the General Assembly,” China’s U.N. Ambassador Wang Guangya said.

The setting of the October 9 date offers another clear indication that Ban is a near certain choice to be the eighth secretary-general of the United Nations’ 60-year history.

Ban has acknowledged criticism that he isn’t strong enough for the job, but noted that as South Korea’s top diplomat, he has dealt with such weighty issues as the international talks aimed at ending the nuclear standoff with neighboring North Korea.

“This has not been an easy job,” Ban told The Associated Press in a recent interview. “You may look at me as a soft person, but I have inner strength. This is what normally people from the outside world would have some difficulty in seeing — people from Asia particularly, when we regard humility, a humbleness, as a very important virtue.”

His dedication to his job is well known. He has said many times that it’s one of his lifelong principles to put his job ahead of private affairs.

“I’m sorry for my family, but even if I can’t take care of my home, I have to do my job first,” he told a class of high school students last year. “Diplomats enjoy a lot of privileges and immunities abroad and therefore, they have unlimited responsibility.”

The wedding ceremony of his eldest daughter last year coincided with a conference that he had to attend. Ban briefly stepped out of the conference to attend the wedding, and then returned to the convention center. It was unclear if his family intentionally chose a wedding hall near the conference center.

Born June 13, 1944, Ban attended the country’s most prestigious institute of higher learning, Seoul National University, where he received a degree in international relations in 1970. He earned a master’s degree in public administration from Harvard University in 1985.

Ban’s first overseas posting was in India, and he also served in Austria, the United Nations and the U.S. along with other positions in Seoul before becoming foreign minister in January 2004.

His campaign for the U.N. position has been low-key, but there have been allegations in some media reports that South Korea has been seeking to buy the job by strategically giving aid to certain developing countries.

Last week, the South Korean Foreign Ministry strongly dismissed those claims, asserting that decisions on where to give aid were planned in advance of Ban’s candidacy for secretary-general.

Brazil leader forced into runoff

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 5:42 am

Brazil leader forced into runoff

BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — Brazil’s leftist president fell short of the votes he needed to win a second term Sunday night, triggering a runoff later this month after his party was slammed in the campaign’s final days with charges of corruption and dirty tricks.

The runoff was announced by election authorities after 98 percent of the vote had been counted, with President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva getting 48.8 percent compared with 41.4 percent for the center-right Geraldo Alckmin, Sao Paulo state’s former governor.

Da Silva, who had been favored to win due to the economic stability and anti-poverty programs he brought to Brazil, needed 50 percent plus one vote to win the contest outright. The two will face each other in a runoff on October 29.

Although da Silva said earlier Sunday he had been confident of a first-round victory, his campaign manager, Marco Aurelio Garcia, said the president and his campaign staff “always prepared ourselves for a two-round election.”

For months, polls have shown da Silva easily winning the race. But da Silva, known universally as Lula, saw his once-commanding lead plummet on the eve of the vote as his Workers’ Party was battered by allegations that party officials tried to buy a mysterious dossier that apparently contained incriminating information about a political rival.

Major newspapers ran front-page photos over the weekend showing piles of money allegedly meant to buy information showing corrupt dealings by an opponent. Local media reported the photos were leaked by federal police.

Da Silva’s party claimed that Alckmin’s supporters were involved, and filed a complaint Sunday with a judge demanding that Alckmin’s candidacy be declared invalid because of the leak. The judge has said he would consider the case. Alckmin’s campaign has denied involvement.

Six members of da Silva’s party, including an old friend who ran his personal security detail, face arrest warrants for their alleged roles in efforts to buy the damaging information and da Silva fired his campaign manager days before the election. The president has repeatedly denied knowledge of any wrongdoing.

Alckmin, of the centrist Social Democracy Party, voted Sunday in Sao Paulo’s upscale neighborhood of Morumbi. He said he was sure there would be a runoff election and that “ethics will defeat corruption.”

For many voters, the corruption allegations appeared to be a deciding factor.

“I’m not going to tell you who I voted for, because the vote is secret,” said Adelaide Venissato, a 53-year-old woman who owns a clothing store.

“But I will tell you who I didn’t vote for. I didn’t vote for Lula. We expected so much and we got very little in terms of security and clean government.”

Reduced poverty.

But others seemed willing to overlook the corruption allegations because they feel their lives have gotten better during da Silva’s four years in office. He has brought a stable economy and social programs that have lifted millions out of poverty.

“I voted for Lula because he worried about workers and the poor,” said Waldo Lima Mendonca, a 49-year-old construction worker. “And the best president for a worker is one who used to be a worker.”

Da Silva’s efforts to reduce poverty played well in the slums of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

“Zero Hunger,” his expanded food stamp-like program, guarantees about $30 a month to virtually all poor families provided they vaccinate their children and keep them in school. It distributes $325 million a month to 45 million of Brazil’s 187 million citizens. The program has helped millions of Brazilians out of poverty, studies show.

More than 126 million Brazilians voted in the election for the president, governors for all 26 states and the federal district, all 513 federal deputies of the lower house and 27 of the 81 Senate seats.

Voting is mandatory in Brazil and those who fail to justify their absence both within Brazil and abroad may be fined.

A poor farmer’s son who became a fiery union leader and was later elected as Brazil’s first leftist president, da Silva surprised many by governing as a moderate once taking office. His deft handling of the economy won him backing on Wall Street and in Brazil’s shantytowns. His second-term priorities include reforming the tax and labor rules.

Da Silva’s change in style didn’t mean embracing the politics of Washington. He clashed head-on with U.S. President George W. Bush over a U.S. proposal to create a continental free-trade area, having termed it a U.S. scheme to “annex” Latin America. Largely because of Brazil’s opposition, the free-trade area never took off.

Abe’s ambitions reflect his past

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 5:28 am

Abe’s ambitions reflect his past

TOKYO, Japan (AP) — Shinzo Abe, chosen by Parliament on Tuesday as Japan’s next prime minister, comes from a line of high-profile politicians — and it shows in his ambitions and policies.

Abe, 52, is grandson of the late Shintaro Abe, who rose to be foreign minister in 1982, but never realized the goal of becoming prime minister.

One measure of the younger Abe’s ambition is the speed with which he has risen to the top of Japan’s political heap. He joined Parliament only in 1993, and is Japan’s youngest post-World War II prime minister, and the first born since the war.

Abe, who only got his first full Cabinet portfolio last fall, as chief Cabinet secretary, rose from relative obscurity to a household name in 2002 when he spearheaded Japan’s efforts to win the release of citizens kidnapped by North Korea.

In terms of policy, Abe seems to have inherited much from his late grandfather, Nobusuke Kishi, who was arrested as a war criminal after World War II but was reinstated to become prime minister from 1957 to 1960.

Kishi was a strong supporter of ties with Washington and championed the passage of the U.S.-Japan security alliance.

Abe’s policies reflect that background.

He has taken an unapologetic stance on Japan’s behavior in the war, pushing for a renewal of patriotic education in public schools, backing textbooks that critics accuse of whitewashing Japan’s wartime past and supporting visits to the Yasukuni war shrine — which honors war criminals among the country’s war dead.

Abe has also vowed to push for revision of the U.S.-drafted Constitution, which bans Japan from military action. The 1947 charter has never been revised, but Abe and others want to change it so the military can join operations abroad.

At the same time, Abe has declared full support for the alliance with the U.S. as the cornerstone of Japanese defense and foreign policies, and is known to be close to powerful conservatives in Washington.

Abe graduated from Tokyo’s Seikei University in 1977 and studied politics at the University of Southern California. After a job at Kobe Steel, Abe entered political life as an aide to his father, and ran for Parliament after his father’s death.

In 2002, he won political acclaim by pressuring North Korea into allowing five kidnapped Japanese citizens to return home for a brief visit. Then he argued successfully not to let them go back to North Korea as planned.

His economic policy is less clear. While he supports Koizumi’s market reforms, he is under pressure in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party to do something about the widening gap between rich and poor in Japan.

A prime challenge for Abe will be mending ties with Asia.

In his five years in office, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has taken a harder line in Japan’s many territorial disputes with its neighbors and riled Asian critics by making annual trips to Yasukuni Shrine.

While Abe supports the shrine, his aides say they are working hard behind the scenes to arrange a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao as a step toward easing tensions.

Abe’s nationalism irks Beijing

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rosemary @ 5:11 am

Abe’s nationalism irks Beijing

TOKYO, Japan (AP) — Nationalist Shinzo Abe becomes Japanese Prime Minister with a promise to create a more assertive Japan and give its military a larger international role.

Abe’s Cabinet picks are expected to reflect his aims for a diplomatically and economically strong Japan.

But the surge in Japan’s assertiveness coincides with the spectacular rise of China’s clout in the region — risking ever greater competition over resources, political influence and military stature in an already unstable region.

Beijing reacted testily to Abe’s landslide victory in last week’s ruling party elections, issuing a terse statement urging the new leader to improve frayed bilateral relations.

Despite that, it’s still not clear what effect Abe’s rise will have. His nationalist credentials could give him room domestically to reach out to China by shielding him from charges of weakness from Japan’s increasingly vocal right.

He’s hinted at that already, publicly acknowledging the need to strengthen ties with China. A top Abe aide on Sunday said setting up a meeting with Chinese leader Hu Jintao was high on the new leader’s agenda.

Still, elements of Abe’s program could complicate the road to better relations.

More prominent role for military.
Though soft-spoken, Abe has some bold goals: He promises to raise Japan’s international stature and revise the country’s pacifist constitution to give the military a more prominent role.

He has also pledged to bring more patriotism to schools, and boost Japan’s military alliance with the United States — both sore points with the Chinese who feel that Japanese textbooks gloss over Japan’s wartime atrocities, and that the U.S.-Japan alliance is aimed at containing Beijing.

Those stands have raised concerns in the region.

“Abe’s rhetoric is very dangerous, given China’s growing clout in the region,” said Hiro Katsumata, a research fellow at the Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies in Singapore.

“It could prompt China to become coercive, and take a more hard-line approach,” Katsumata said. “Today’s China won’t back down.”

The origins of that standoff predate Abe. Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has already raised Japan’s military visibility by dispatching troops to assist U.S.-led reconstruction efforts in Iraq and sending ships to the Indian Ocean to provide fuel for coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Koizumi also insisted on paying his respects at Tokyo’s Yasukuni war shrine, which has strong links to Japan’s right wing, enraging China and others who say Japanese leaders have not fully atoned for the country’s wartime aggression. Summit-level meetings between the two countries have been suspended for over a year.

Abe has visited the shrine on many occasions, but has shrewdly kept mum on whether he will visit as prime minister, thereby silencing — for now — both pacifists and the right wing.

Revisionist history textbooks.
Still, he could soon be hindered by his conservative views of Japanese history, said Lu Xijin, professor of international relations at Daito Bunka University in Tokyo. Abe has supported revisionist history textbooks, for instance.

“The major obstacle to Japan’s Asia policy has been differing perceptions of the past,” Lu said. “It would negatively affect China-Japan relations if Abe prioritizes his own principles.”

Finding common ground will be difficult also because what’s at stake isn’t just bilateral relations, but the countries’ relative standing in the region, as well cooperation on regional hot spots like North Korea.

When Pyongyang test-fired seven missiles in July, Tokyo — spearheaded by Abe — slapped immediate sanctions on the North and pushed for a punitive resolution at the U.N. Security Council. China protested that Japan was overreacting, and Tokyo was finally forced to settle on a weaker resolution.

The spat at the U.N. came after China, a veto-yielding, permanent member of the Security Council, helped wreck Japan’s hopes of joining that privileged club. A sulky Japan has threatened to reduce its U.N. dues and demanded that China increase its own contribution.

Tokyo and Beijing have also clashed over who will take the lead in regional economic integration, with Japan pushing for a wider free trade zone stretching from India and Australia to dilute Beijing’s rising economic power.

At odds with Beijing.
And the two are at odds as they scramble for energy, vying over gas and oil resources in a disputed section of the East China Sea, a pipeline from Siberia in Russia, and secure passage through the Malacca Straits, the narrow Southeast Asian causeway through which virtually all Middle Eastern and African oil headed to East Asia moves.

“Who gets to call the shots, politically and economically, in Asia — there’s a coming clash of interests there,” Katsumata said.

Meanwhile, both sides have been flexing their military muscle. China has announced double-digit spending increases for its 2.5 million-member military nearly every year since the early 1990s, prompting Japan’s Defense Agency to list China’s military expansion as a top security concern in the region.

While Japan hasn’t increased spending, the Cabinet last month endorsed a bill to upgrade the Defense Agency to a full-fledged ministry to reflect the growing role of the country’s military.

Tokyo recently wrapped up a historic non-combat troop deployment to Iraq — the country’s first to a combat zone in 60 years — and is also in the midst of a sweeping realignment of the 50,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan to assume a more prominent role in regional security.

Koizumi left the Prime Minister’s Office Tuesday with a bouquet of flowers in his hands as supporters cheered, ending more than five years in office marked by far-reaching changes such as passage of legislation to privatize the postal service.

“There is no end to reform,” he said in a parting statement. “I hope that the public will work with the new prime minister to believe in Japan’s future and continue the reform with courage and hope.”

  • Archives

  • Blog at WordPress.com.